Skip to content
54

valterra

Worth a look

Shows a sweet-spot price point ($33.20 avg), but brand-locked demand (top 5 brands take 96% of clicks) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 58Growth 80Conversion 63Competition 45Returns 48Price range 89Avg price 95Brand share 10Review moat 49Quality gap 27

Avg price

Incredible$33.20

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Great$13.75–$105.04

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Growth

Great+71.3%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Conversion

Good5.6%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Market size

Good$468K

$468K/yr · 251K searches

Review moat

Okay1,629.21

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Returns

Okay3.2%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Competition

Okay58%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Quality gap

Okay4.6★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Brand share

Bad96%

top-5 brand share — brand-locked demand

Competition

The top 5 products take 58% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

7 rising

Sellers

111

Top-5 brand share

96%

Open market

2%

  • Camco40%
  • Valterra32%
  • GLOBIZ16%
  • TonGass5%
  • DUMPMAN3%
  • hurrventer2%
  • Open — no brand owns it (1 brand, 2%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%5%$23K10%$47K15%$70K20%$94K1101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 24 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 97 weeks — +71.3% search growth over the last 90 days.
9K7KSpike '24Spike '25Prime Day '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: May, Jun, Jul, Aug · busiest ÷ quietest = 3.1×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Size-Overall15%

“Direct fit”

Quality-Overall15%

“Well made item”

Advertised Vs Actual Product12%

“As advertised”

Assembly/Installation10%

“Easy to assemble”

Leak-Proof8%

“Does not leak”

Efficiency7%

“The valve works smoothly”

Ease Of Use6%

“Easy to use”

Value For Money5%

“Good value”

Ease Of Cleaning3%

“Keeping it clean”

Maintenance And Repair2%

“Great product for an easy fix”

What buyers complain about

Leak-Proof31%

“It leaks”

Durability14%

“Broke after one month”

Quality-Overall8%

“Poor quality control”

Size-Overall4%

“so would not fit”

Assembly/Installation3%

“Assembly quality Questionable”

Product Condition2%

“Not New”

Strength2%

“Way too brittle”

Material Quality2%

“Cheap plastic”

Jamming/Clogging2%

“It was all great until we started to notice our toilet began to get more and more clogged”

Spray/Flow2%

“Doesn't spray up into the tank as I thought it should”

Top return reasons

Size-Overall29%
Leak-Proof12%
Defective Material/Parts10%
Compatibility-Overall9%
Advertised Vs Actual Product6%
Connectivity-Overall4%
Functionality-Overall4%
Product Condition4%
Value For Money3%
Add-Ons/Attachments3%