Skip to content
52

upper control arm bushing

Worth a look

Shows a thin review moat (97 avg reviews), but weak search conversion (1.5%) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 27Growth 22Conversion 19Competition 83Returns 36Price range 89Avg price 95Brand share 53Review moat 95Quality gap 75

Review moat

Incredible97.19

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Avg price

Incredible$33.85

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Great$9.74–$101.48

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Competition

Great32%

top-5 click share — an open shelf

Quality gap

Great4.3★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Brand share

Good73%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Returns

Okay4.7%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Market size

Okay$113K

$113K/yr · 225K searches

Growth

Bad-5.7%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Conversion

Bad1.5%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Competition

Clicks spread well past the top 5 (32% combined) — an open shelf where new products get seen.

Brands

23 falling

Sellers

113

Top-5 brand share

73%

Open market

22%

  • MOOG40%
  • A-Premium16%
  • NewYall6%
  • ACDelco6%
  • MOTOKU5%
  • APDTY4%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%4%$5K8%$9K12%$14K16%$18K1101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 63 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 91 weeks — -5.7% search growth over the last 90 days.
5K4KSpike '25Spike '26NovDecJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJun

No pronounced peak months · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.7×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Size-Overall33%

“Fit good”

Quality-Overall22%

“Good parts”

Value For Money10%

“great price”

Durability8%

“are very durable”

Assembly/Installation7%

“Easy enough to install”

Advertised Vs Actual Product4%

“product is what we expected”

Efficiency4%

“Worked as aspected”

Strength2%

“Sturdy”

Maintenance And Repair2%

“This fixed all my problems works good with my 09 polaris ranger 700xp good replacement parts”

Product Condition2%

“the part is still very new”

What buyers complain about

Size-Overall33%

“They look smaller”

Quality-Overall12%

“Junk”

Advertised Vs Actual Product10%

“The bushings don't even look like the picture”

Assembly/Installation6%

“Getting the control arms off, pressing out the old bushings, and installing the new ones takes proper tools and time, especially if the original bushings are seized or dry-rotted”

Material Quality6%

“Cheap plastic”

Measurement/Reading Accuracy4%

“The tolerances on these bushings are not correct”

Mechanism Issues4%

“Stiffened up the ole ride right up”

Thickness3%

“They are to thick”

Ease Of Use3%

“This is not a quick job”

Durability2%

“so I don't expect these to last very long at all”

Top return reasons

Size-Overall39%
Compatibility-Overall14%
Defective Material/Parts12%
Advertised Vs Actual Product11%
Assembly/Installation6%
Functionality-Overall4%
Material Quality3%
Value For Money2%
Quality-Overall2%
Product Condition1%