Skip to content
50

transmission pan

Worth a look

Shows a thin review moat (166 avg reviews), but prices mostly outside the sweet spot ($25.82–$549.20) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 59Growth 24Conversion 21Competition 81Returns 48Price range 14Avg price 69Brand share 54Review moat 92Quality gap 45

Review moat

Great165.63

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Competition

Great34%

top-5 click share — an open shelf

Avg price

Good$116.92

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Market size

Good$478K

$478K/yr · 248K searches

Brand share

Good73%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Returns

Okay3.3%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Quality gap

Okay4.5★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Growth

Bad-1.1%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Conversion

Bad1.7%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Price range

Bad$25.82–$549.20

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Competition

Clicks spread well past the top 5 (34% combined) — an open shelf where new products get seen.

Brands

26 falling

Sellers

146

Top-5 brand share

73%

Open market

24%

  • Dorman36%
  • A-Premium20%
  • Banks Power8%
  • Pacific Performance Engineering5%
  • MOTOKU5%
  • MK-Morzon3%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%3%$14K6%$29K9%$43K12%$57K1101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)2 products missing review or click data not plotted

All 72 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -1.1% search growth over the last 90 days.
5K3KSpike '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

No pronounced peak months · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.5×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Size-Overall37%

“Better fit”

Quality-Overall15%

“Excellent quality”

Value For Money8%

“fair price”

Leak-Proof8%

“doesn't leak”

Advertised Vs Actual Product4%

“As advertised”

Assembly/Installation4%

“Easy installation”

Filtration2%

“Great pan and Filter kit”

Durability2%

“It's durable”

Ease Of Use2%

“Quick, easy, and neat to do now”

Strength1%

“The aluminum construction feels much more solid”

What buyers complain about

Leak-Proof30%

“Leaks”

Quality-Overall8%

“this ones pretty cheap quality”

Compatibility-Overall7%

“Didnt fit 99 Tahoe”

Filtration6%

“The filter didnt seat properly”

Size-Overall5%

“DOES NOT FIT AS STATED”

Advertised Vs Actual Product4%

“The item description does not contain this info”

Value For Money3%

“Not a good deal at all”

Ease Of Use3%

“I had a hard time getting it to seal completely”

Thickness2%

“it does feel a bit thinner”

Defective Material/Parts2%

“so probably just a manufacturer defect”

Top return reasons

Size-Overall36%
Compatibility-Overall17%
Advertised Vs Actual Product7%
Defective Material/Parts6%
Leak-Proof6%
Value For Money5%
Quality-Overall3%
Filtration2%
Maintenance And Repair2%
Functionality-Overall2%