Skip to content
56

transmission jack

Worth a look

Shows a thin review moat (109 avg reviews), but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 93Growth 22Conversion 19Competition 68Returns 51Price range 6Avg price 45Brand share 61Review moat 95Quality gap 81

Review moat

Great108.78

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Market size

Great$1.9M

$1.9M/yr · 581K searches

Quality gap

Great4.2★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Competition

Good44%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Brand share

Good68%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Returns

Good3.0%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Avg price

Okay$205.71

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Growth

Bad-5.8%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Conversion

Bad1.6%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Price range

Bad$38.78–$1138.97

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Competition

The top 5 products take 44% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

19 falling

Sellers

41

Top-5 brand share

68%

Open market

26%

  • VEVOR24%
  • Lucky Seven16%
  • Garvee15%
  • GarveeTech7%
  • Maxority7%
  • KAFLLA5%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%4%$75K8%$149K12%$224K16%$298K1101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)2 products missing review or click data not plotted

All 37 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -5.8% search growth over the last 90 days.
13K8KSepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

No pronounced peak months · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.3×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Quality-Overall21%

“well made”

Value For Money14%

“Worth the money”

Strength11%

“It was very stable once I got the transmission”

Efficiency9%

“Works well”

Ease Of Use9%

“Easy peasy”

Advertised Vs Actual Product7%

“Works as it should”

Functionality-Overall5%

“it works”

Assembly/Installation5%

“It took me less than 10 minutes to put the dolly together”

Design-Overall2%

“Seems well built and versatile”

Adjustability/Rotatability/Reclining2%

“lowering makes it easier for operation”

What buyers complain about

Quality-Overall14%

“This is a low quality product”

Size-Overall12%

“Too narrow”

Durability6%

“Thing fell apart”

Mounting6%

“It doesn't mount to my jack”

Assembly/Installation6%

“Missing half of the bolts to assemble and no instructions”

Strap/String Quality5%

“I was unable to release the strap properly because the transmission tunnel was in the way”

Strength4%

“Weak”

Functionality-Overall4%

“Product broke never work properly”

Compatibility-Overall4%

“Would not work on 3 different jacks”

Value For Money4%

“Cheap”

Top return reasons

Compatibility-Overall26%
Size-Overall24%
Defective Material/Parts9%
Functionality-Overall8%
Mechanism Issues7%
Advertised Vs Actual Product5%
Mounting2%
Leak-Proof2%
Value For Money2%
Quality-Overall2%