Skip to content
60

transmission filter

Worth a look

Shows a sweet-spot price point ($20.62 avg), but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 73Growth 20Conversion 35Competition 86Returns 58Price range 79Avg price 89Brand share 77Review moat 75Quality gap 43

Avg price

Great$20.62

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Competition

Great29%

top-5 click share — an open shelf

Price range

Great$4.38–$56.64

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Brand share

Great58%

top-5 brand share — no brand owns this niche

Review moat

Great494.72

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Market size

Good$794K

$794K/yr · 1.4M searches

Returns

Good2.7%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Quality gap

Okay4.5★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Conversion

Okay2.8%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Growth

Bad-9.2%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

Clicks spread well past the top 5 (29% combined) — an open shelf where new products get seen.

Brands

31 falling

Sellers

133

Top-5 brand share

58%

Open market

38%

  • Fitede25%
  • ACDelco14%
  • A-Premium8%
  • atp automotive6%
  • YzusGomumu5%
  • Wix4%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%4%$32K8%$64K12%$95K16%$127K1101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 67 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -9.2% search growth over the last 90 days.
30K20KSepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

No pronounced peak months · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.3×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Size-Overall31%

“Fit just like the OEM”

Quality-Overall15%

“Quality product at a fair price”

Filtration12%

“filter fix good”

Value For Money11%

“GOOD PRICE”

Advertised Vs Actual Product8%

“As advertised”

Efficiency4%

“It works great”

Leak-Proof4%

“absolutely leak-free”

Assembly/Installation3%

“Easy installation”

Lubrication1%

“Very good fluid”

Durability1%

“It has worked well after one month”

What buyers complain about

Size-Overall17%

“Way too short”

Filtration13%

“I have no reason to expect this will not filter as it should”

Compatibility-Overall11%

“not for the pathfinder”

Leak-Proof10%

“oil leaked everywhere”

Quality-Overall8%

“damage and extra cost from low quality product”

Ease Of Use3%

“not worth using”

Rubber Quality2%

“Rubber gasket was a pain”

Assembly/Installation2%

“I have yet to install it”

Value For Money2%

“they are a little more expensive than the regular store brand”

Lubrication2%

“Bad oil”

Top return reasons

Size-Overall27%
Compatibility-Overall24%
Filtration13%
Advertised Vs Actual Product7%
Defective Material/Parts5%
Value For Money5%
Leak-Proof4%
Functionality-Overall2%
Quality-Overall2%
Assembly/Installation2%