Skip to content
54

tireject

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.6%), but brand-locked demand (top 5 brands take 89% of clicks) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 46Growth 58Conversion 49Competition 41Returns 97Price range 33Avg price 92Brand share 26Review moat 46Quality gap 62

Returns

Incredible0.6%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Avg price

Great$53.44

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Quality gap

Good4.4★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Growth

Good+33.0%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Conversion

Okay3.9%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Market size

Okay$246K

$246K/yr · 118K searches

Review moat

Okay1,928.5

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Competition

Okay60%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Price range

Okay$7.87–$268.40

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Brand share

Okay89%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Competition

The top 5 products take 60% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

11 flat

Sellers

49

Top-5 brand share

89%

Open market

8%

  • TireJect56%
  • AIRMAN20%
  • LiquiTube6%
  • Fiberglass Supply Depot4%
  • SILCA3%
  • Slime3%
  • Open — no brand owns it (5 brands, 8%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%5%$12K10%$25K15%$37K20%$49K1101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 24 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +33.0% search growth over the last 90 days.
10K6KSpike '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: May · busiest ÷ quietest = 3.3×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Efficiency18%

“Worked as described”

Quality-Overall15%

“Excellent product”

Advertised Vs Actual Product12%

“As Advertised”

Ease Of Use11%

“Easy to use”

Leak-Proof10%

“helps prevent future leaks”

Value For Money5%

“Great value”

Assembly/Installation2%

“Easy to install”

Instructions/User Manual/Troubleshooting2%

“The instructions were very clear easy process and worked”

Safety Standards2%

“Great for emergencies”

Durability2%

“has been reliable in my setup”

What buyers complain about

Leak-Proof22%

“This product seems to have plugged the leak”

Functionality-Overall11%

“Never worked”

Quality-Overall6%

“Trash product”

Flatness6%

“Tired of flat”

Ease Of Use5%

“impossible to use”

Value For Money5%

“it may come at a cost”

Ease Of Cleaning2%

“It's a bit messy to use and pricy”

Pressure2%

“Arrived no pressure”

Spray/Flow2%

“Would not spray when can held with nozzle up”

Natural Resource Wastage2%

“Waste of time and money”

Top return reasons

Functionality-Overall23%
Leak-Proof18%
Size-Overall11%
Advertised Vs Actual Product10%
Compatibility-Overall9%
Value For Money6%
Defective Material/Parts3%
Product Condition2%
Maintenance And Repair1%
Flatness1%