Skip to content
51

tire weights

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.8%), but brand-locked demand (top 5 brands take 91% of clicks) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 32Growth 30Conversion 78Competition 46Returns 96Price range 85Avg price 95Brand share 23Review moat 56Quality gap 28

Returns

Incredible0.8%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Avg price

Incredible$28.31

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Great$5.32–$86.58

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Conversion

Great7.7%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Review moat

Good1,244.5

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Competition

Okay57%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Market size

Okay$149K

$149K/yr · 68K searches

Growth

Okay+3.8%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Quality gap

Okay4.6★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Brand share

Bad91%

top-5 brand share — brand-locked demand

Competition

The top 5 products take 57% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

11 flat

Sellers

27

Top-5 brand share

91%

Open market

7%

  • CKAuto62%
  • JiiinMiiin13%
  • ZERINT8%
  • MIKKUPPA5%
  • C-HORSE2%
  • EASYBERG2%
  • Open — no brand owns it (5 brands, 7%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%10%$15K20%$30K30%$45K40%$60K1101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 24 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +3.8% search growth over the last 90 days.
4K3KSpike '24Spike '25Prime Day '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Aug · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.5×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Quality-Overall21%

“Good assortment”

Adhesion/Stickiness15%

“sticks well”

Value For Money14%

“Good value”

Advertised Vs Actual Product13%

“works as it should”

Efficiency8%

“They will get the job done”

Ease Of Use6%

“Easy to use”

Size-Overall4%

“Fit good”

Weight Heavy4%

“Great weights for balancing wheels”

Assembly/Installation2%

“Easy to install”

Durability2%

“havent come off in about 6 months”

What buyers complain about

Adhesion/Stickiness57%

“Adhesive SUCKS”

Wheel Quality10%

“Wouldn't fit wheel at first had to open the clip a little”

Quality-Overall9%

“Garbage”

Size-Overall3%

“Could be a better fit”

Durability3%

“Not great had a few fall off”

Value For Money3%

“Not worth the money”

Design-Overall2%

“terrible design”

Flatness2%
Weight Heavy2%

“Its heavy, it sticks to stuff”

Thickness2%

“therefore to make them thin they are are little wider/longer. 5/8 x 3/4”

Top return reasons

Adhesion/Stickiness26%
Size-Overall15%
Wheel Quality11%
Functionality-Overall10%
Advertised Vs Actual Product6%
Value For Money5%
Defective Material/Parts4%
Width4%
Weight Heavy3%
Color2%