Skip to content
51

supercharger

Worth a look

Shows beatable incumbent ratings (4.1★), but pricing outside the sweet spot ($772.25 avg) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 71Growth 25Conversion 5Competition 59Returns 88Price range 2Avg price 0Brand share 73Review moat 46Quality gap 88

Quality gap

Great4.1★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Returns

Great1.3%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Brand share

Good61%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Market size

Good$748K

$748K/yr · 242K searches

Competition

Good50%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Review moat

Okay1,871.39

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Growth

Bad-0.4%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Conversion

Bad0.4%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Price range

Bad$9.47–$4534.03

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Avg price

Bad$772.25

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Competition

The top 5 products take 50% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

28 rising

Sellers

51

Top-5 brand share

61%

Open market

33%

  • Mixizap21%
  • HinLIaDa13%
  • coolautocore11%
  • Speedmaster10%
  • Trolling MAN6%
  • Sawyer Auto5%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%4%$30K8%$60K12%$90K16%$120K1101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)8 products missing review or click data not plotted

All 33 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -0.4% search growth over the last 90 days.
6K4KPrime Day '25SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

No pronounced peak months · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.3×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Charging54%

“Charges my phone fast”

Quality-Overall9%

“A high quality product at a very reliable price”

Value For Money9%

“Good for the price”

Advertised Vs Actual Product6%

“As Advertised”

Efficiency5%

“Working good”

Durability3%

“Both cables feel durable and well-constructed, with a secure fit that stays firmly connected during use”

Compatibility-Overall2%

“Very compatible”

Length1%

“The length is true”

Strength1%

“Stability is good, functioning perfectly, battery life fast charging for sure, size is a little big but not bad, and stability is good as well”

Ease Of Use1%

“easy to see”

What buyers complain about

Charging38%

“SLOW CHARGING”

Durability21%

“DOESN'T LAST”

Quality-Overall8%

“Complete garbage”

Functionality-Overall6%

“Not working properly”

Heating3%

“Got super hot”

Advertised Vs Actual Product3%

“False advertising”

Value For Money2%

“A waste of money”

Compatibility-Overall1%

“Is not compatible with ALL devices”

Socket/Port/Plug1%

“Does not fit plug securely”

Defective Material/Parts1%

“one is broken”

Top return reasons

Charging58%
Compatibility-Overall16%
Size-Overall6%
Functionality-Overall5%
Advertised Vs Actual Product3%
Length2%
Connectivity-Overall2%
Defective Material/Parts2%
Value For Money2%
Socket/Port/Plug2%