Skip to content
45

somfy charger

Skip it

High returns (6.8%) — this niche doesn't clear our bar today.

Market size 40Growth 25Conversion 45Competition 60Returns 22Price range 23Avg price 73Brand share 29Review moat 75Quality gap 76

Quality gap

Great4.3★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Review moat

Great498.41

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Avg price

Good$107.27

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Competition

Good49%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Conversion

Okay3.6%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Market size

Okay$207K

$207K/yr · 53K searches

Brand share

Okay88%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Growth

Okay+0.2%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Price range

Bad$15.29–$383.01

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Returns

Bad6.8%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Competition

The top 5 products take 49% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

13 rising

Sellers

25

Top-5 brand share

88%

Open market

10%

  • somfy71%
  • Joworthy5%
  • SMSZQR4%
  • solsinsy4%
  • vhbw3%
  • QIHOWHUE3%
  • Open — no brand owns it (7 brands, 10%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%5%$10K10%$21K15%$31K20%$41K1101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 32 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 53 weeks — +0.2% search growth over the last 90 days.
1K800JulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJun

No pronounced peak months · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.2×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Quality-Overall20%

“Outstanding quality very easy to install”

Assembly/Installation18%

“so easy to assemble”

Charging7%

“I is a great charger”

Remote Control6%

“the remote works great”

Advertised Vs Actual Product6%

“Works as advertised”

Value For Money5%

“affordable”

Noise Level4%

“Quiet and reliable”

Ease Of Use4%

“So Convenient We Bought 3”

Size-Overall3%

“They fit well”

Connectivity-Overall3%

“Its simple to connect”

What buyers complain about

Functionality-Overall16%

“Didnt work”

Charging12%

“None were long enough to charge the laptop”

Instructions/User Manual/Troubleshooting9%

“First, the instructions that come with the remote are utterly useless”

Battery Life4%

“hated the process of getting the battery tubes out every 3-4 months”

Compatibility-Overall4%

“Unfortunatly, although the cord fit into my lithium ion battery, it wasn't compatible because it did not charge my item”

Assembly/Installation4%

“It was a little tricky at first to configure”

Value For Money4%

“These cost a lot of money”

Size-Overall4%

“However, when they arrived, the measurements were wrong”

Quality-Overall3%

“Cheaper is not always better”

Durability2%

“Did not last too long as magnet in the unit rusted out”

Top return reasons

Charging25%
Compatibility-Overall23%
Size-Overall13%
Functionality-Overall12%
Connectivity-Overall11%
Defective Material/Parts4%
Advertised Vs Actual Product3%
Product Condition2%
Value For Money2%
Socket/Port/Plug1%