Skip to content
49

shurflo

Skip it

Brand-locked demand (top 5 brands take 100% of clicks) — this niche doesn't clear our bar today.

Market size 75Growth 68Conversion 77Competition 4Returns 63Price range 72Avg price 82Brand share 0Review moat 45Quality gap 35

Avg price

Great$81.50

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Conversion

Great7.5%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Market size

Good$841K

$841K/yr · 138K searches

Price range

Good$43.09–$122.38

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Growth

Good+49.2%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Returns

Good2.5%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Review moat

Okay1,963.43

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Quality gap

Okay4.5★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Competition

Bad96%

top-5 click share — a locked-up shelf

Brand share

Bad100%

top-5 brand share — brand-locked demand

Competition

The top 5 products capture 96% of clicks — a locked-up shelf that new listings rarely crack.

Brands

4 rising

Sellers

30

Top-5 brand share

100%

Open market

0%

  • SHURFLO49%
  • 00033%
  • PowerMax16%
  • ECO-WORTHY3%
  • Open — no brand owns it (0%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%10%$84K20%$168K30%$252K40%$337K101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 7 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +49.2% search growth over the last 90 days.
4K3KHoliday '24Spike '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: May, Jun · busiest ÷ quietest = 2.0×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Assembly/Installation16%

“Easy installation”

Pressure12%

“has very good pressure”

Size-Overall11%

“Exact fit”

Noise Level11%

“Easy to plumb quiet”

Quality-Overall9%

“the Ecoworthy appears to be just as reliable”

Value For Money9%

“I also like the price very affordable”

Advertised Vs Actual Product8%

“it worked as advertised”

Efficiency4%

“This new pump is working well”

Ease Of Use4%

“EASY PEASY”

Leak-Proof3%

“There were no leaks”

What buyers complain about

Durability22%

“failed soon after”

Leak-Proof16%

“Temperamental and leaky”

Functionality-Overall15%

“Didnt work”

Noise Level13%

“Very loud”

Size-Overall6%

“It was too small for needs so thinking easy return”

Material Quality5%

“then it breaks because of cheap material”

Advertised Vs Actual Product4%

“The threads on this pump are advertised as 1/2 NPT - they are not”

Value For Money4%

“Not worth the money”

Assembly/Installation3%

“Will have to splice it back together”

Quality-Overall2%

“Can they make things with quality anymore”

Top return reasons

Functionality-Overall18%
Defective Material/Parts16%
Size-Overall9%
Product Condition8%
Leak-Proof7%
Compatibility-Overall6%
Connectivity-Overall5%
Value For Money5%
Advertised Vs Actual Product4%
Filtration2%