Skip to content
52

screw in tire plugs

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.3%), but soft demand (-49.1% this quarter) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 58Growth 0Conversion 85Competition 37Returns 98Price range 41Avg price 40Brand share 64Review moat 78Quality gap 52

Returns

Incredible0.3%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Conversion

Great9.6%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Review moat

Great430.59

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Brand share

Good67%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Market size

Good$470K

$470K/yr · 453K searches

Quality gap

Good4.4★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Price range

Okay$4.33–$22.31

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Avg price

Okay$10.85

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Competition

Okay63%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Growth

Bad-49.1%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

The top 5 products take 63% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

19 falling

Sellers

23

Top-5 brand share

67%

Open market

30%

  • MetFun28%
  • Bawkars20%
  • AUTOWN8%
  • LYLDYYW7%
  • KUNVAST5%
  • NACHLYNN4%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%10%$47K20%$94K30%$141K40%$188K101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 22 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 53 weeks — -49.1% search growth over the last 90 days.
60K40KPrime Day '25Spike '25Holiday '25Spike '26JulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJun

Peak months: Jan, Feb, Dec · busiest ÷ quietest = 31.4×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Ease Of Use21%

“Very handy”

Quality-Overall13%

“Amazing quality”

Efficiency9%

“cool product works great”

Value For Money9%

“Excellent value”

Advertised Vs Actual Product9%

“it works exactly as intended”

Maintenance And Repair7%

“Nice repair kit great price”

Leak-Proof5%

“No leaky”

Assembly/Installation4%

“Easy to install”

Durability3%

“Seems durable”

Size-Overall2%

“They fit securely”

What buyers complain about

Leak-Proof18%

“it just leaked constantly”

Functionality-Overall15%

“didn't work well for me”

Size-Overall11%

“But did not fit”

Quality-Overall7%

“Garbage”

Advertised Vs Actual Product5%

“Deceiving picture”

Value For Money4%

“it would have been cheaper”

Rubber Quality3%

“The rubber plug is too soft”

Flatness2%

“the tire was completely flat”

Maintenance And Repair2%

“Not a long term repair”

Adhesion/Stickiness2%

“Upon using the adhesive comes off before entering the hole”

Top return reasons

Size-Overall28%
Functionality-Overall16%
Advertised Vs Actual Product11%
Leak-Proof8%
Defective Material/Parts6%
Maintenance And Repair6%
Adhesion/Stickiness4%
Value For Money3%
Material Quality3%
Quality-Overall3%