Skip to content
52

rv hose storage

Worth a look

Shows a sweet-spot price point ($45.53 avg), but a concentrated shelf (top 5 take 73% of clicks) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 47Growth 82Conversion 39Competition 23Returns 48Price range 92Avg price 95Brand share 29Review moat 74Quality gap 45

Avg price

Incredible$45.53

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Great$12.24–$97.92

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Growth

Great+76.6%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Review moat

Good558.47

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Returns

Okay3.2%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Market size

Okay$253K

$253K/yr · 179K searches

Quality gap

Okay4.5★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Conversion

Okay3.1%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Brand share

Okay88%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Competition

Bad73%

top-5 click share — a locked-up shelf

Competition

The top 5 products capture 73% of clicks — a locked-up shelf that new listings rarely crack.

Brands

10 rising

Sellers

52

Top-5 brand share

88%

Open market

9%

  • Touri37%
  • Valterra36%
  • RVZONE6%
  • Mysora5%
  • Tough Grade4%
  • Gociean4%
  • Open — no brand owns it (4 brands, 9%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%10%$25K20%$51K30%$76K40%$101K1101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 15 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +76.6% search growth over the last 90 days.
10K6KSpike '24Spike '25Prime Day '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: May, Jun, Jul, Aug · busiest ÷ quietest = 4.6×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Quality-Overall16%

“Excellent quality”

Assembly/Installation14%

“the installation took very little time”

Size-Overall9%

“The hoses fit easily in the tube”

Storage Capacity9%

“The storage containers work well”

Advertised Vs Actual Product7%

“As advertised”

Value For Money6%

“Good Value”

Strength5%

“Very sturdy”

Durability4%

“very durable”

Adjustability/Rotatability/Reclining4%

“It's adjustable to fit most any length you need”

Ease Of Use4%

“easy to operate”

What buyers complain about

Mounting19%

“Didn't come with mounting screws or brackets”

Size-Overall10%

“But this is too long”

Durability7%

“Plastic door broke”

Value For Money5%

“This item isn't worth the price”

Thickness3%

“The tube seems to be pretty thick”

Quality-Overall3%

“Cheap Quality”

Metal Quality2%

“It was a little difficult getting the screws through the heavy metal”

Add-Ons/Attachments2%

“Then trying to get the extensions apart was a pain”

Flexibility2%

“It is very rigid so using the straps isn't necessary unless you're extending it way out”

Advertised Vs Actual Product2%

“Didn't see the size noted in the photo or notes”

Top return reasons

Size-Overall46%
Defective Material/Parts11%
Mounting9%
Compatibility-Overall6%
Advertised Vs Actual Product4%
Assembly/Installation4%
Functionality-Overall3%
Value For Money2%
Add-Ons/Attachments2%
Width2%