Skip to content
59

roof tar

Worth a look

Shows low returns (1.8%), but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 54Growth 66Conversion 38Competition 75Returns 79Price range 23Avg price 79Brand share 51Review moat 71Quality gap 47

Returns

Great1.8%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Avg price

Great$89.91

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Competition

Great40%

top-5 click share — an open shelf

Review moat

Good642.6

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Growth

Good+46.4%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Market size

Good$372K

$372K/yr · 137K searches

Brand share

Good74%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Quality gap

Okay4.5★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Conversion

Okay3.0%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Price range

Bad$5.66–$380.57

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Competition

Clicks spread well past the top 5 (40% combined) — an open shelf where new products get seen.

Brands

16 falling

Sellers

120

Top-5 brand share

74%

Open market

20%

  • Henry36%
  • Gardner-Gibson14%
  • Liquid Rubber11%
  • Geocel9%
  • Gardner5%
  • Liquid Nails5%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%3%$11K6%$22K9%$34K12%$45K1101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)1 product missing review or click data not plotted

All 40 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +46.4% search growth over the last 90 days.
4K3KSpike '24Spike '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Apr, May, Jun · busiest ÷ quietest = 2.0×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Quality-Overall16%

“Excellent product”

Ease Of Use13%

“Easy to use”

Leak-Proof9%

“No leaking”

Advertised Vs Actual Product9%

“As advertised”

Value For Money9%

“Great value for the money”

Water Resistance5%

“Great waterproofing”

Efficiency5%

“White roof sealant that works well”

Durability5%

“It is very strong and durable”

Adhesion/Stickiness4%

“It seems to adhere well and looks great”

Paint Quality3%

“Decent coating”

What buyers complain about

Thickness11%

“Was expecting it to be thicker”

Leak-Proof11%

“my RV had a leak”

Paint Quality9%

“This is not what I spect is more like a bucket of flat paint”

Quality-Overall8%

“This should never have made it past quality control”

Adhesion/Stickiness8%

“doesnt adhere well smells awful”

Ease Of Use6%

“Not super easy to use”

Size-Overall5%

“This size is not enough to treat your entire RV”

Durability5%

“It broke down and looks terrible”

Value For Money4%

“A bit expensive”

Smell3%

“Gets really chemical smell while storing between layers”

Top return reasons

Advertised Vs Actual Product14%
Color13%
Leak-Proof12%
Size-Overall7%
Value For Money7%
Functionality-Overall6%
Paint Quality4%
Compatibility-Overall4%
Coverage3%
Thickness3%