Skip to content
59

refrigerant scale

Worth a look

Shows demand growing +97.3% this quarter, but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 69Growth 90Conversion 73Competition 23Returns 79Price range 44Avg price 84Brand share 35Review moat 74Quality gap 27

Growth

Great+97.3%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Avg price

Great$74.11

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Returns

Great1.8%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Review moat

Good552.29

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Conversion

Good6.8%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Market size

Good$717K

$717K/yr · 143K searches

Price range

Okay$31.99–$186.11

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Brand share

Okay84%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Quality gap

Okay4.6★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Competition

Bad73%

top-5 click share — a locked-up shelf

Competition

The top 5 products capture 73% of clicks — a locked-up shelf that new listings rarely crack.

Brands

10 falling

Sellers

34

Top-5 brand share

84%

Open market

12%

  • Elitech37%
  • VIVOHOME18%
  • YELLOW JACKET14%
  • P PBAUTOS11%
  • SKEAP4%
  • PB Motor Tech BMT4%
  • Open — no brand owns it (4 brands, 12%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%10%$72K20%$143K30%$215K40%$287K1101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 14 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +97.3% search growth over the last 90 days.
7K5KSpike '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: May, Jun, Jul · busiest ÷ quietest = 4.3×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Value For Money24%

“For the price”

Quality-Overall19%

“its been a solid tool so far”

Advertised Vs Actual Product10%

“Works as advertised”

Ease Of Use10%

“easy to read from a distance”

Measurement/Reading Accuracy8%

“seems pretty accurate at a reasonable price”

Efficiency4%

“This scale has performed well so far”

Charging3%

“has been reliable throughout the entire charging process”

Strength3%

“made sturdy”

Weight Heavy2%

“It measures the weight of things well”

Durability2%

“Its very durable”

What buyers complain about

Measurement/Reading Accuracy17%

“Numbers kept moving no matter how many times I reset”

Durability13%

“Doesnt last”

Assembly/Installation7%

“They go in staggered”

Functionality-Overall7%

“Does not work correctly very bad refrigeration scale never worked even once”

Strength7%

“a little flimsy”

Size-Overall5%

“Its much smaller”

Design-Overall3%

“Design & quality inefficiency”

Product Condition3%

“OBVIOUSLY a previously returned item sold as new”

Quality-Overall3%

“Design & quality inefficiency”

Material Quality3%

“it's made out of poor materials”

Top return reasons

Measurement/Reading Accuracy21%
Value For Money16%
Functionality-Overall14%
Size-Overall13%
Advertised Vs Actual Product5%
Product Condition5%
Quality-Overall4%
Defective Material/Parts4%
Compatibility-Overall4%
Battery Life2%