Skip to content
60

radiator support

Worth a look

Shows a thin review moat (45 avg reviews), but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 48Growth 23Conversion 21Competition 96Returns 62Price range 22Avg price 77Brand share 92Review moat 98Quality gap 78

Review moat

Incredible45.09

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Competition

Incredible14%

top-5 click share — an open shelf

Brand share

Great43%

top-5 brand share — no brand owns this niche

Quality gap

Great4.3★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Avg price

Great$95.02

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Returns

Good2.5%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Market size

Okay$258K

$258K/yr · 163K searches

Growth

Bad-3.6%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Price range

Bad$6.51–$387.75

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Conversion

Bad1.7%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Competition

Clicks spread well past the top 5 (14% combined) — an open shelf where new products get seen.

Brands

67 rising

Sellers

141

Top-5 brand share

43%

Open market

53%

  • Garage-Pro16%
  • BALOCEO11%
  • ALMULOO7%
  • CarPartsDepot5%
  • YoRise4%
  • Lyxheth3%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%1%$3K2%$5K3%$8K4%$10K1101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)22 products missing review or click data not plotted

All 137 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -3.6% search growth over the last 90 days.
4K3KSpike '25SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

No pronounced peak months · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.3×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Size-Overall45%

“Fit perfect”

Quality-Overall14%

“Good reliable product”

Value For Money9%

“saved me a lot of money”

Advertised Vs Actual Product8%

“as advertised”

Assembly/Installation4%

“Easy to install”

Ease Of Use2%

“Easy to use”

Material Quality2%

“Good solid product”

Strength1%

“Sturdy and good material”

Design-Overall1%

“Worked as was designed”

Correct Contents1%

“The parts was right”

What buyers complain about

Size-Overall27%

“Way to small”

Quality-Overall11%

“Not very happy with quality”

Defective Material/Parts8%

“Missing parts”

Compatibility-Overall5%

“Didnt fit on my Acura TL 2010 SH”

Rubber Quality4%

“the rubber is not flexible enough to manipulate them into place even if they did fit”

Strength3%

“was also sort of flimsy we will see how it holds up later”

Instructions/User Manual/Troubleshooting3%

“No instructions included as to how to utilize the springs”

Sensor3%

“Air bag sensor support, it was manufactured wrong, you will need resources and more time to adapt the support to the airbag sensor for me it was complicated, because I had little time I only had 1 hour to change the support, radiator and air conditioning condenser”

Thickness3%

“Like really thin and cheap”

Material Quality2%

“Costly mistake and made with severely cheap plastic”

Top return reasons

Size-Overall52%
Compatibility-Overall10%
Mounting9%
Defective Material/Parts8%
Advertised Vs Actual Product7%
Assembly/Installation2%
Functionality-Overall2%
Value For Money2%
Material Quality1%
Quality-Overall1%