Skip to content
55

proportioning valve

Worth a look

Shows a thin review moat (89 avg reviews), but high returns (5.6%) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 30Growth 40Conversion 50Competition 58Returns 28Price range 68Avg price 95Brand share 67Review moat 96Quality gap 87

Review moat

Incredible89.17

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Avg price

Incredible$42.78

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Quality gap

Great4.1★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Price range

Good$6.95–$131.81

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Brand share

Good65%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Competition

Good50%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Conversion

Good4.0%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Growth

Okay+11.8%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Market size

Okay$137K

$137K/yr · 80K searches

Returns

Okay5.6%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Competition

The top 5 products take 50% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

25 rising

Sellers

110

Top-5 brand share

65%

Open market

32%

  • Wilwood29%
  • POWERWORKS22%
  • AISHAN6%
  • Nakkaa4%
  • LDMINDA4%
  • DUZFOREI3%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%4%$5K8%$11K12%$16K16%$22K1101001K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 35 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +11.8% search growth over the last 90 days.
2K2KSpike '25SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

No pronounced peak months · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.3×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Quality-Overall30%

“Good quality”

Advertised Vs Actual Product12%

“As Advertised”

Efficiency10%

“work great now nice machine work to it”

Functionality-Overall7%

“Brakes must work perfectly”

Assembly/Installation6%

“It was not difficult to install”

Pressure5%

“The large knurled knob is easy to turn and makes fine tuning brake pressure quick and precise”

Size-Overall5%

“Fit was nice”

Value For Money3%

“Nice lil valve for the money”

Product Condition3%

“Quality, that's new”

Safety Standards3%

“feels safer driving”

What buyers complain about

Leak-Proof24%

“Leaked out of every orifice”

Quality-Overall17%

“It's like they didn't pass the wilwood quality control”

Functionality-Overall11%

“But, again, it did not function as intended”

Pressure10%

“Doesnt do anything, same pressure all the way in and out”

Value For Money5%

“Lot cheaper than oem”

Sensor3%

“brake fluid started pissing out of the sensor on top”

Size-Overall3%

“the electrical sending unit was too big for my current setup so just took it out of the old one and swapped them”

Spray/Flow3%

“Fluid would not flow thru once installed”

Compatibility-Overall3%

“This product did not fit my 1989 GMC Sierra pick up don't know how it works on the Wright application”

Assembly/Installation3%

“At first I thought maybe I installed it wrong”

Top return reasons

Size-Overall26%
Compatibility-Overall18%
Leak-Proof13%
Defective Material/Parts10%
Functionality-Overall5%
Advertised Vs Actual Product5%
Pressure3%
Mechanism Issues3%
Product Condition2%
Mounting2%