Skip to content
59

propane tank holder

Worth a look

Shows a sweet-spot price point ($35.46 avg), but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 43Growth 38Conversion 35Competition 81Returns 47Price range 64Avg price 95Brand share 87Review moat 85Quality gap 58

Avg price

Incredible$35.46

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Brand share

Great48%

top-5 brand share — no brand owns this niche

Review moat

Great305.08

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Competition

Great34%

top-5 click share — an open shelf

Price range

Good$9.97–$142.44

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Quality gap

Good4.4★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Returns

Okay3.4%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Market size

Okay$229K

$229K/yr · 234K searches

Growth

Okay+10.7%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Conversion

Okay2.8%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Competition

Clicks spread well past the top 5 (34% combined) — an open shelf where new products get seen.

Brands

40 rising

Sellers

75

Top-5 brand share

48%

Open market

47%

  • Flame King19%
  • Camco9%
  • Hicarer9%
  • RVPNR6%
  • ZXFNNCY5%
  • MAIQIYALAN5%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%3%$7K6%$14K9%$21K12%$28K1101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 62 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +10.7% search growth over the last 90 days.
5K3KSpike '25Black Friday '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

No pronounced peak months · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.3×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Size-Overall15%

“Fits and works as advertised”

Quality-Overall12%

“The construction is high quality”

Advertised Vs Actual Product10%

“Was as advertised”

Strength8%

“Well built”

Assembly/Installation7%

“easy to assemble”

Ease Of Use6%

“Easy to use”

Value For Money6%

“Good for the price”

Efficiency4%

“Does a decent job”

Mounting3%

“Great Mount That Looks Good”

Durability3%

“Its durable”

What buyers complain about

Size-Overall13%

“Gas bottles don't fit”

Quality-Overall10%

“not great quality”

Mounting6%

“No hardware for mounting”

Assembly/Installation6%

“I did not understand that assembly was required”

Functionality-Overall5%

“Not working”

Strength4%

“Not very strong”

Value For Money4%

“Not worth the cheap price get something better”

Advertised Vs Actual Product4%

“They are misrepresented this product”

Durability3%

“After a few uses, it stopped working”

Ease Of Use2%

“Couldn use”

Top return reasons

Size-Overall49%
Functionality-Overall7%
Advertised Vs Actual Product7%
Compatibility-Overall5%
Value For Money4%
Leak-Proof2%
Flammable2%
Mechanism Issues2%
Quality-Overall2%
Mounting2%