Skip to content
50

pinewood derby weights

Worth a look

Shows low returns (1.5%), but soft demand (-86.3% this quarter) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 37Growth 0Conversion 60Competition 70Returns 85Price range 49Avg price 67Brand share 72Review moat 79Quality gap 25

Returns

Great1.5%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Review moat

Great420.36

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Brand share

Good62%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Competition

Good43%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Avg price

Good$14.05

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Conversion

Good5.2%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Price range

Okay$7.05–$22.78

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Market size

Okay$186K

$186K/yr · 252K searches

Quality gap

Okay4.6★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Growth

Bad-86.3%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

The top 5 products take 43% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

21 rising

Sellers

51

Top-5 brand share

62%

Open market

31%

  • Derbopine20%
  • CKAuto14%
  • DerbyCraftPro12%
  • QoTang9%
  • pinedash pro7%
  • Woodland Scenics7%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%4%$7K8%$15K12%$22K16%$30K1101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)1 product missing review or click data not plotted

All 39 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -86.3% search growth over the last 90 days.
23K18KSpike '24Black Friday '24Spike '25Black Friday '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Jan, Feb, Mar · busiest ÷ quietest = 47.8×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Quality-Overall14%

“this is a great quality set”

Ease Of Use13%

“super easy to work with”

Advertised Vs Actual Product13%

“Just what we needed”

Adhesion/Stickiness10%

“Sticks good”

Value For Money7%

“Good value”

Size-Overall5%

“come in two needed sizes”

Efficiency5%

“This kit is helpful if youre working on a pinewood derby car”

Weight Light4%

“The weights feel light quality”

Weight Heavy4%

“the weights were accurate”

Design-Overall3%

“Great variety of items to help build a winner”

What buyers complain about

Adhesion/Stickiness19%

“Adhesive SUCKS”

Size-Overall7%

“They are a little bigger than expected though”

Weight Heavy7%

“Its heavy, it sticks to stuff”

Advertised Vs Actual Product7%

“Therefore, they appear to be significantly under the advertised weight of 7 g. thats a pretty large error”

Value For Money7%

“more expensive”

Thickness6%

“Less dense than tungsten”

Quality-Overall5%

“Garbage”

Durability3%

“Not great had a few fall off”

Measurement/Reading Accuracy2%

“I didn't check them with a scale for accuracy as that isn't important to me”

Strength1%

“Case is weak”

Top return reasons

Weight Heavy21%
Size-Overall16%
Adhesion/Stickiness12%
Advertised Vs Actual Product7%
Value For Money6%
Weight Light6%
Functionality-Overall5%
Defective Material/Parts5%
Wheel Quality4%
Material Quality2%