Skip to content
53

onan 4000 tune up kit

Worth a look

Shows a sweet-spot price point ($63.45 avg), but prices mostly outside the sweet spot ($8.25–$623.76) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 26Growth 53Conversion 48Competition 61Returns 76Price range 14Avg price 88Brand share 54Review moat 83Quality gap 55

Avg price

Great$63.45

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Review moat

Great340.48

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Returns

Great1.9%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Competition

Good49%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Quality gap

Good4.4★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Brand share

Good73%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Growth

Good+24.9%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Conversion

Okay3.8%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Market size

Okay$108K

$108K/yr · 44K searches

Price range

Bad$8.25–$623.76

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Competition

The top 5 products take 49% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

16 rising

Sellers

70

Top-5 brand share

73%

Open market

23%

  • Cummins37%
  • GPS15%
  • FLYINGAMZ8%
  • ATRACYPART7%
  • Topkidame5%
  • partszen4%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%10%$11K20%$22K30%$32K40%$43K1101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 25 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +24.9% search growth over the last 90 days.
2K2KSpike '24Spike '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Aug, Oct · busiest ÷ quietest = 2.3×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Size-Overall21%

“Direct fit”

Quality-Overall19%

“Good quality”

Value For Money15%

“well worth it”

Assembly/Installation11%

“Easy installation”

Advertised Vs Actual Product8%

“As advertised”

Filtration5%

“The air filter seems to be of good quality”

Fuel Efficiency4%

“Generator is now more efficient”

Efficiency3%

“Works perfectly”

Functionality-Overall2%

“Works great”

Correct Contents2%

“Perfect kit”

What buyers complain about

Functionality-Overall17%

“Did not work”

Durability14%

“died in ~5minutes”

Filtration14%

“Dont trust the fuel filter”

Quality-Overall8%

“The air filter is the worst quality”

Maintenance And Repair5%

“I wish I had replaced it sooner”

Product Condition5%

“Received a used carburetor and hose only”

Compatibility-Overall4%

“They contacted us to let us know that it's not compatible with our ONAN generator”

Defective Material/Parts4%

“Cummins part number”

Leak-Proof2%

“leaking fuel into the engine”

Pressure2%

“ours had too much pressure”

Top return reasons

Size-Overall22%
Functionality-Overall19%
Defective Material/Parts11%
Compatibility-Overall10%
Filtration10%
Leak-Proof6%
Fuel Efficiency3%
Value For Money3%
Advertised Vs Actual Product3%
Assembly/Installation2%