Skip to content
40

oil furnace filter

Skip it

Soft demand (-77.3% this quarter) — this niche doesn't clear our bar today.

Market size 13Growth 0Conversion 63Competition 23Returns 93Price range 85Avg price 95Brand share 33Review moat 88Quality gap 24

Avg price

Incredible$23.52

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Returns

Great1.1%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Review moat

Great244.94

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Price range

Great$8.11–$61.70

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Conversion

Good5.6%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Brand share

Okay85%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Quality gap

Bad4.6★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Competition

Bad72%

top-5 click share — a locked-up shelf

Market size

Bad$52K

$52K/yr · 40K searches

Growth

Bad-77.3%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

The top 5 products capture 72% of clicks — a locked-up shelf that new listings rarely crack.

Brands

11 rising

Sellers

72

Top-5 brand share

85%

Open market

11%

  • General Filters47%
  • HVAC Parts22%
  • Ganivsor6%
  • Westwood5%
  • General Filters, Inc5%
  • Generic4%
  • Open — no brand owns it (5 brands, 11%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%10%$5K20%$10K30%$16K40%$21K101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 17 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 36 weeks — -77.3% search growth over the last 90 days.
2K1KSpike '26Nov '25Dec '25Jan '26Mar '26Apr '26May '26

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Filtration27%

“Good filter”

Size-Overall26%

“Fits great”

Assembly/Installation13%

“Easy install”

Advertised Vs Actual Product9%

“Exactly as described”

Leak-Proof7%

“No leaks”

Material Quality7%

“Excelente material”

Ease Of Use7%

“figured it out pretty easily”

Value For Money3%

“an excellent price”

Quality-Overall2%

“Quality”

What buyers complain about

Filtration33%

“If you dont have a filter”

Advertised Vs Actual Product33%

“The product was not as depicted”

Quality-Overall11%

“Poor quality oring”

Leak-Proof11%

“Started to leak”

Durability11%

“The oring does not last”

Top return reasons

Size-Overall52%
Filtration16%
Advertised Vs Actual Product9%
Value For Money7%
Compatibility-Overall4%
Defective Material/Parts3%
Quality-Overall1%
Ease Of Cleaning1%
Connectivity-Overall1%
Measurement/Reading Accuracy1%