Skip to content
56

motorcycle tpms

Worth a look

Shows beatable incumbent ratings (4.0★), but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 38Growth 58Conversion 42Competition 45Returns 33Price range 73Avg price 92Brand share 54Review moat 81Quality gap 95

Quality gap

Incredible4.0★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Avg price

Great$53.94

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Review moat

Great372.95

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Price range

Good$27.29–$127.12

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Growth

Good+32.8%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Brand share

Good72%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Competition

Okay58%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Conversion

Okay3.4%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Market size

Okay$190K

$190K/yr · 104K searches

Returns

Okay5.1%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Competition

The top 5 products take 58% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

16 rising

Sellers

43

Top-5 brand share

72%

Open market

22%

  • FOBO39%
  • Sykik10%
  • leepee9%
  • Liwogi9%
  • KEMIMOTO6%
  • LNKERCO5%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%10%$19K20%$38K30%$57K40%$76K1101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 21 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +32.8% search growth over the last 90 days.
3K2KSpike '25Prime Day '25Holiday '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

No pronounced peak months · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.7×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Assembly/Installation17%

“Easy install”

Pressure10%

“these monitors help me keep a continuous eye on pressure”

Quality-Overall9%

“Quality is great”

Ease Of Use7%

“Easy to use”

Efficiency7%

“The sensors work great”

Value For Money6%

“worth every penny”

Advertised Vs Actual Product4%

“Works as advertised”

Measurement/Reading Accuracy4%

“Seems accurate”

Safety Standards4%

“Great safety addition”

Battery Life3%

“Battery life is good - I do try to remember to turn the receiver off when not riding for a few days”

What buyers complain about

Sensor9%

“No sensor connection”

Battery Life7%

“Batteries were half dead”

Functionality-Overall7%

“Disappointing performance”

Durability7%

“broke in half”

Instructions/User Manual/Troubleshooting6%

“Instructions are poor”

Connectivity-Overall5%

“Wireless not working correctly”

Measurement/Reading Accuracy5%

“Inaccurate readings”

Charging4%

“mine didn't charge at all either”

Software/Application4%

“the software is an absolute horrible situation”

Value For Money4%

“A little pricey”

Top return reasons

Functionality-Overall15%
Sensor12%
Connectivity-Overall9%
Charging8%
Software/Application7%
Size-Overall6%
Compatibility-Overall6%
Pressure5%
Defective Material/Parts5%
Measurement/Reading Accuracy5%