Skip to content
55

motorcycle shirts for men

Worth a look

Shows a fragmented shelf (top 5 take 18% of clicks), but weak search conversion (0.3%) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 20Growth 87Conversion 4Competition 96Returns 32Price range 32Avg price 87Brand share 67Review moat 46Quality gap 60

Competition

Incredible18%

top-5 click share — an open shelf

Growth

Great+89.2%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Avg price

Great$65.71

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Brand share

Good65%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Quality gap

Good4.4★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Review moat

Okay1,894.61

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Returns

Okay5.1%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Price range

Okay$10.16–$273.13

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Market size

Bad$80K

$80K/yr · 381K searches

Conversion

Bad0.3%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Competition

Clicks spread well past the top 5 (18% combined) — an open shelf where new products get seen.

Brands

44 falling

Sellers

57

Top-5 brand share

65%

Open market

32%

  • Milwaukee Leather28%
  • WICKED STOCK12%
  • KEMIMOTO10%
  • J.A.G.10%
  • Vance Leather5%
  • DUHAN4%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%2%$2K4%$3K6%$5K8%$6K1101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 113 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +89.2% search growth over the last 90 days.
35K25KHoliday '24Spike '25Prime Day '25Holiday '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Mar, Apr, Aug · busiest ÷ quietest = 4.7×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Size-Overall28%

“Fits to size”

Quality-Overall18%

“The pads are good quality”

Comfort-Overall9%

“Its very comfortable”

Value For Money6%

“Worth it”

Weight Light5%

“Lightweight and very comfortable”

Material Quality4%

“Great material”

Durability2%

“Very durable”

Color2%

“Great selection of colors”

Advertised Vs Actual Product2%

“match pretty much exactly with the images”

Shape/Style1%

“Stylish and good quality”

What buyers complain about

Size-Overall39%

“Runs a bit small”

Quality-Overall7%

“Quality issues”

Durability4%

“Ripped on the first wear”

Weight Heavy3%

“Bulky”

Material Quality2%

“Cheap See Thru Material”

Value For Money2%

“Just wish it was a little more affordable”

Comfort-Overall2%

“Its not very comfortable”

Certifications1%

“the padding is not CE certified”

Thickness1%

“Seems a little thicker/tougher than your regular flannel”

Thin1%

“Material was thinner than expected”

Top return reasons

Size-Overall65%
Chest Fit5%
Length4%
Sleeve Fit3%
Material Quality3%
Advertised Vs Actual Product3%
Color2%
Shoulder Fit2%
Waist Fit2%
Thin1%