Skip to content
50

motorcycle knee pads

Worth a look

Shows a sweet-spot price point ($61.87 avg), but weak search conversion (1.3%) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 33Growth 53Conversion 16Competition 77Returns 23Price range 65Avg price 89Brand share 62Review moat 34Quality gap 58

Avg price

Great$61.87

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Competition

Great38%

top-5 click share — an open shelf

Price range

Good$15.80–$145.42

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Brand share

Good68%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Quality gap

Good4.4★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Growth

Good+24.3%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Review moat

Okay3,129.66

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Market size

Okay$159K

$159K/yr · 204K searches

Returns

Bad6.4%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Conversion

Bad1.3%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Competition

Clicks spread well past the top 5 (38% combined) — an open shelf where new products get seen.

Brands

18 falling

Sellers

74

Top-5 brand share

68%

Open market

25%

  • Fox Racing20%
  • DUHAN17%
  • Scoyco12%
  • Alpinestars10%
  • Tempsnow9%
  • EVS8%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%3%$5K6%$10K9%$14K12%$19K1101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 44 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +24.3% search growth over the last 90 days.
5K3KSpike '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

No pronounced peak months · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.6×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Size-Overall16%

“They fit snuggly”

Comfort-Overall16%

“Comfortable and sturdy”

Quality-Overall14%

“Good quality comfortable”

Value For Money8%

“Great value”

Cushion5%

“Very padded and comfortable”

Protection4%

“Body Protection that Works”

Advertised Vs Actual Product3%

“As described”

Durability3%

“they hold up well to regular use”

Pain Relief-Overall2%

“didn't get hurt at all”

Exercise/Sports Suitability2%

“I can squat, kneel and crawl comfortably on them”

What buyers complain about

Cushion12%

“Not happy with the quality of the cushion”

Size-Overall12%

“Too tight”

Durability10%

“Doesn't last”

Flatness5%

“Completely flat”

Comfort-Overall5%

“very uncomfortable to wear”

Quality-Overall5%

“Poor quality”

Strap/String Quality4%

“the straps did not even budge”

Thickness3%

“For chunky”

Functionality-Overall2%

“Didnt work for me”

Pain Relief-Overall2%

“painful for me”

Top return reasons

Size-Overall61%
Cushion7%
Advertised Vs Actual Product6%
Comfort-Overall4%
Value For Money3%
Thigh Fit2%
Functionality-Overall2%
Material Quality1%
Strap/String Quality1%
Product Condition1%