Skip to content
56

mopar

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.9%), but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 69Growth 17Conversion 73Competition 52Returns 96Price range 73Avg price 93Brand share 39Review moat 64Quality gap 28

Returns

Incredible0.9%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Avg price

Great$50.63

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Conversion

Good6.7%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Price range

Good$12.85–$129.55

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Market size

Good$712K

$712K/yr · 209K searches

Review moat

Good931.17

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Competition

Good54%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Brand share

Okay82%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Quality gap

Okay4.6★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Growth

Bad-17.0%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

The top 5 products take 54% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

13 rising

Sellers

85

Top-5 brand share

82%

Open market

14%

  • Mopar53%
  • Doc's Auto Parts11%
  • Doc's Diesel6%
  • RARAYC6%
  • MOPAR5%
  • ATRACYPART4%
  • Open — no brand owns it (7 brands, 14%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%10%$71K20%$142K30%$214K40%$285K101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 23 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -17.0% search growth over the last 90 days.
10K6KSpike '24Holiday '24Spike '25Prime Day '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Dec · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.9×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Filtration25%

“Great filter”

Value For Money21%

“Great value”

Size-Overall17%

“Fit perfect”

Quality-Overall15%

“Best quality”

Advertised Vs Actual Product7%

“As advertised”

Assembly/Installation3%

“Installed without any issues”

Fuel Efficiency2%

“Perfect Fit and Reliable Fuel Filtration”

Efficiency1%

“Works fine”

Durability1%

“Durable”

Lubrication1%

“Company this with Royal Purple oil and its perfection”

What buyers complain about

Filtration37%

“BAD FILTERS”

Quality-Overall16%

“Poor Quality Control”

Fuel Efficiency7%

“did not allow fuel to the motor”

Functionality-Overall5%

“Doesn't work or fit properly”

Value For Money5%

“expensive”

Compatibility-Overall3%

“Does not fit 2024 ram 6.7”

Size-Overall2%

“Cabin air filter doesn't fit”

Material Quality1%

“of sketchy materials”

Metal Quality1%

“Not the metal canister that my truck required”

Durability1%

“collapsed inward. see attached photo”

Top return reasons

Filtration33%
Size-Overall17%
Compatibility-Overall13%
Advertised Vs Actual Product11%
Defective Material/Parts9%
Value For Money6%
Functionality-Overall3%
Product Condition1%
Fuel Efficiency1%
Quality-Overall1%