Skip to content
51

lf3970

Worth a look

Shows searches that convert (16.5% search→purchase), but brand-locked demand (top 5 brands take 93% of clicks) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 25Growth 53Conversion 98Competition 22Returns 96Price range 60Avg price 94Brand share 18Review moat 96Quality gap 27

Conversion

Incredible16.5%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Review moat

Incredible72.21

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Returns

Incredible0.9%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Avg price

Great$46.70

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Good$19.68–$154.23

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Growth

Good+25.0%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Quality gap

Okay4.6★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Market size

Okay$101K

$101K/yr · 13K searches

Competition

Bad74%

top-5 click share — a locked-up shelf

Brand share

Bad93%

top-5 brand share — brand-locked demand

Competition

The top 5 products capture 74% of clicks — a locked-up shelf that new listings rarely crack.

Brands

8 rising

Sellers

34

Top-5 brand share

93%

Open market

4%

  • Fleetguard66%
  • ATRACYPART15%
  • EMINENTGLOW6%
  • GETOPAUTO4%
  • PEIYAOTCO3%
  • CFKIT3%
  • Open — no brand owns it (2 brands, 4%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%10%$10K20%$20K30%$30K40%$40K1101001K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 14 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 97 weeks — +25.0% search growth over the last 90 days.
400300Spike '24Spike '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Apr · busiest ÷ quietest = 2.1×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Advertised Vs Actual Product33%

“Items as described”

Value For Money33%

“Very fair price”

Quality-Overall17%

“Good quality”

Lubrication8%

“Works well i change oil frequently so these are a good price point”

Efficiency8%

“Works great”

What buyers complain about

Filtration33%

“Today, I needed one, and discovered after an hour of unending frustration that NONE of the four filters I purchased fits onto my 2006 Ram with 5.9l Cummins engine”

Compatibility-Overall33%

“Does not fit 6.7l cummins”

Advertised Vs Actual Product17%

“Poor advertising as it stated it was a direct fit to my truck”

Size-Overall17%

“did not fit truck”

Top return reasons

Size-Overall39%
Filtration30%
Compatibility-Overall10%
Advertised Vs Actual Product9%
Value For Money6%
Defective Material/Parts4%
Motor Issues2%
Assembly/Installation2%