Skip to content
54

level 1 ev charger

Worth a look

Shows a thin review moat (212 avg reviews), but prices mostly outside the sweet spot ($79.78–$335.41) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 76Growth 52Conversion 34Competition 65Returns 17Price range 8Avg price 58Brand share 64Review moat 89Quality gap 62

Review moat

Great211.73

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Market size

Great$922K

$922K/yr · 222K searches

Competition

Good46%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Brand share

Good67%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Quality gap

Good4.4★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Avg price

Good$152.41

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Growth

Good+22.5%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Conversion

Okay2.7%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Returns

Bad7.9%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Price range

Bad$79.78–$335.41

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Competition

The top 5 products take 46% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

18 falling

Sellers

32

Top-5 brand share

67%

Open market

28%

  • Lectron29%
  • BETUMODA12%
  • EVDANCE10%
  • bokman10%
  • VEVOR6%
  • Grasside6%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%4%$37K8%$74K12%$111K16%$147K101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)1 product missing review or click data not plotted

All 30 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +22.5% search growth over the last 90 days.
5K3KHoliday '24Spike '25Prime Day '25Holiday '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

No pronounced peak months · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.6×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Charging37%

“supports fast charging”

Value For Money11%

“Excellent value”

Quality-Overall10%

“Build quality feels solid”

Ease Of Use7%

“Easy to use”

Advertised Vs Actual Product6%

“As advertised”

Efficiency4%

“It does the work”

Portability2%

“Great portable charger”

Assembly/Installation2%

“Easy to install”

Connectivity-Overall2%

“great connectivity”

Design-Overall2%

“Very well built”

What buyers complain about

Charging24%

“my car stops charging”

Durability11%

“Broke after a month and a half”

Quality-Overall6%

“Poor quality”

Heating4%

“which could result in overheating some common household outlets”

Functionality-Overall4%

“did not work”

Connectivity-Overall3%

“Sometimes the plug has been difficult to disconnect”

Value For Money2%

“What a waste of money”

Socket/Port/Plug2%

“gets stuck in a Toyota bZ4X socket”

Instructions/User Manual/Troubleshooting2%

“and it was not the correct App in the instructions”

Flammable2%

“FIRE DANGER”

Top return reasons

Charging52%
Compatibility-Overall15%
Functionality-Overall5%
Size-Overall4%
Value For Money4%
Advertised Vs Actual Product3%
Connectivity-Overall3%
Socket/Port/Plug3%
Amplification2%
Defective Material/Parts2%