Skip to content
61

lawn mower fuel filter

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.7%), but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 24Growth 86Conversion 81Competition 60Returns 96Price range 12Avg price 24Brand share 80Review moat 73Quality gap 40

Returns

Incredible0.7%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Growth

Great+88.5%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Conversion

Great8.4%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Brand share

Great55%

top-5 brand share — no brand owns this niche

Review moat

Good570.71

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Competition

Good49%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Quality gap

Okay4.5★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Market size

Bad$95K

$95K/yr · 133K searches

Avg price

Bad$8.57

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Bad$4.75–$16.36

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Competition

The top 5 products take 49% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

26 falling

Sellers

57

Top-5 brand share

55%

Open market

40%

  • CocoMocart15%
  • Snwoygr13%
  • Strongthium12%
  • MEAJOO8%
  • WYTUDTE8%
  • ASSOTS5%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%4%$4K8%$8K12%$11K16%$15K101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 31 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +88.5% search growth over the last 90 days.
5K3KSpike '24Spike '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Apr, May, Jun · busiest ÷ quietest = 3.6×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Filtration16%

“the air filter for perfect”

Value For Money16%

“Great Value”

Size-Overall14%

“Fit great”

Advertised Vs Actual Product13%

“As advertised”

Quality-Overall13%

“Quality filter”

Efficiency6%

“It works great”

Fuel Efficiency4%

“Keep your fuel clean”

Assembly/Installation4%

“Just as described; installed and worked as expected”

Durability1%

“Did not break or crack during install”

Leak-Proof1%

“the supplied clamps prevent any leakage”

What buyers complain about

Leak-Proof19%

“All of them leaked”

Filtration16%

“Bad filter”

Quality-Overall15%

“Poor quality”

Size-Overall10%

“Tiny”

Durability7%

“Do not last”

Fuel Efficiency2%

“Dirty gas”

Material Quality2%

“Cheap plastic”

Value For Money2%

“Way cheaper”

Strength2%

“Very brittle plastic”

Defective Material/Parts2%

“One plastic retainer broke on removal,used Amit and bolt to retain”

Top return reasons

Size-Overall63%
Filtration13%
Compatibility-Overall5%
Advertised Vs Actual Product4%
Defective Material/Parts2%
Value For Money2%
Leak-Proof2%
Quality-Overall2%
Functionality-Overall1%
Fuel Efficiency1%