Skip to content
52

kawasaki fr691v

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.5%), but a small market ($40K/yr) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 10Growth 77Conversion 59Competition 23Returns 97Price range 87Avg price 95Brand share 46Review moat 67Quality gap 30

Returns

Incredible0.5%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Avg price

Incredible$31.87

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Great$10.25–$56.01

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Growth

Great+64.7%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Review moat

Good822.71

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Conversion

Good5.1%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Brand share

Okay77%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Quality gap

Okay4.6★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Competition

Bad72%

top-5 click share — a locked-up shelf

Market size

Bad$40K

$40K/yr · 25K searches

Competition

The top 5 products capture 72% of clicks — a locked-up shelf that new listings rarely crack.

Brands

15 flat

Sellers

50

Top-5 brand share

77%

Open market

19%

  • Kawasaki39%
  • EPR Distribution16%
  • HOODELL10%
  • Emmawin8%
  • Harbot5%
  • Hipa4%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%10%$4K20%$8K30%$12K40%$16K101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 17 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 61 weeks — +64.7% search growth over the last 90 days.
1K600Prime Day '25Spike '25Spike '26MayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJun

Peak months: Mar, Apr, May, Jul · busiest ÷ quietest = 7.7×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Size-Overall27%

“Correct fit”

Value For Money22%

“Best value”

Quality-Overall15%

“Feels like dependable quality”

Advertised Vs Actual Product11%

“Works as advertised”

Assembly/Installation4%

“Install was not bad”

Efficiency3%

“Husband bike runs great”

Correct Contents3%

“It came with everything I needed”

Lubrication3%

“Makes oil changes easier”

Maintenance And Repair2%

“Perfect maintenance kit”

Durability1%

“One of very few that works will have to see how it holds up over time”

What buyers complain about

Filtration19%

“Wrong filter”

Size-Overall11%

“it does not fit”

Compatibility-Overall9%

“it does not fit”

Leak-Proof7%

“They started leaking”

Quality-Overall7%

“seems lower quality than the original”

Durability5%

“Stopped working after a few months”

Value For Money4%

“get it all a little cheaper”

Defective Material/Parts4%

“The unit failed to work and all I has was problems with poor idle and large amount of blue and black smoke”

Advertised Vs Actual Product3%

“False advertising”

Fuel Efficiency3%

“I couldnt get the fuel pump to work i primed it”

Top return reasons

Size-Overall43%
Advertised Vs Actual Product10%
Filtration10%
Compatibility-Overall10%
Defective Material/Parts8%
Functionality-Overall4%
Value For Money3%
Leak-Proof2%
Motor Issues2%
Assembly/Installation1%