Skip to content
55

jeep air filter

Worth a look

Shows searches that convert (12.7% search→purchase), but strong incumbent ratings (4.7★) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 23Growth 41Conversion 95Competition 54Returns 83Price range 86Avg price 93Brand share 65Review moat 46Quality gap 16

Conversion

Incredible12.7%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Avg price

Great$22.20

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Great$9.96–$56.61

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Returns

Great1.6%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Brand share

Good66%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Competition

Good53%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Review moat

Okay1,907.88

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Growth

Okay+13.0%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Market size

Bad$91K

$91K/yr · 32K searches

Quality gap

Bad4.7★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Competition

The top 5 products take 53% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

18 falling

Sellers

82

Top-5 brand share

66%

Open market

29%

  • K&N41%
  • ACDelco8%
  • KAX8%
  • Purolator5%
  • StaunchAuto5%
  • Forccord4%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%10%$9K20%$18K30%$27K40%$36K101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 24 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 62 weeks — +13.0% search growth over the last 90 days.
900700Prime Day '25Spike '25Spike '26MayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJun

No pronounced peak months · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.3×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Size-Overall41%

“Excellent fit”

Filtration16%

“Filters look to be of good quality”

Quality-Overall14%

“Good quality, easy to install”

Value For Money11%

“Worth the price”

Assembly/Installation7%

“Install was quick”

Advertised Vs Actual Product3%

“As advertised”

Efficiency2%

“Not only does this filter much better”

Durability2%

“Durable and good quality”

Ease Of Use0%

“Now you can easily access everything”

Strength0%

“Solid 💯”

What buyers complain about

Thickness15%

“The gasket is too thick”

Advertised Vs Actual Product11%

“The product description claims this works for the 2015 Toyota Camry. It does not.”

Quality-Overall10%

“Not as good as I though it would be”

Filtration8%

“compared to a puralator filter that was installed this filter feels like it will disintegrate”

Assembly/Installation7%

“might cause some difficulty in when installing”

Size-Overall6%

“Does not fit”

Value For Money4%

“Cheap”

Strength4%

“Very flimsy filter”

Fuel Efficiency3%

“Gas mileage appears to have gone up about 10%”

Rubber Quality3%

“The black rubber gasket around the white filter was loose”

Top return reasons

Size-Overall50%
Compatibility-Overall20%
Filtration15%
Value For Money3%
Advertised Vs Actual Product3%
Defective Material/Parts2%
Product Condition1%
Shape/Style1%
Quality-Overall1%
Functionality-Overall0%