Skip to content
56

idle air control valve

Worth a look

Shows a thin review moat (91 avg reviews), but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 58Growth 22Conversion 35Competition 72Returns 18Price range 64Avg price 95Brand share 59Review moat 95Quality gap 92

Review moat

Incredible90.7

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Avg price

Incredible$27.13

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Quality gap

Great4.0★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Competition

Good42%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Price range

Good$6.87–$140.27

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Brand share

Good70%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Market size

Good$466K

$466K/yr · 616K searches

Conversion

Okay2.8%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Growth

Bad-6.8%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Returns

Bad7.7%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Competition

The top 5 products take 42% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

21 falling

Sellers

56

Top-5 brand share

70%

Open market

27%

  • A-Premium33%
  • KUQUTIDY21%
  • Walker Products6%
  • Delphi5%
  • Tesnaao4%
  • NPAUTO4%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%10%$47K20%$93K30%$140K40%$186K1101001K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 37 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -6.8% search growth over the last 90 days.
13K8KSepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

No pronounced peak months · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.2×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Size-Overall24%

“Fit great”

Efficiency15%

“Works perfectly”

Quality-Overall14%

“Good quality”

Value For Money13%

“Good value”

Advertised Vs Actual Product12%

“Works as advertised”

Assembly/Installation6%

“Installation was a breeze”

Functionality-Overall4%

“Works as it should”

Ease Of Use3%

“Easy and works with no issues”

Durability2%

“it is fairly easy to replace”

Material Quality1%

“Solid product”

What buyers complain about

Size-Overall19%

“Wrong fit”

Quality-Overall14%

“Poor quality”

Functionality-Overall13%

“Do not function properly”

Compatibility-Overall12%

“Incompatible part to Suzuki xl 7. This is not compatible to my car although you have indicated that it fits my car.”

Durability9%

“Failed at only 3 years”

Defective Material/Parts8%

“Not the right part”

Advertised Vs Actual Product3%

“The description bsaus it fits the car but this part doesn't even exist for the car I ordered it from. It's integral to the throttle body”

Sensor3%

“Most aftermarket TPS sensors for these engines are junk”

Assembly/Installation3%

“It ran worse after installing this one”

Connectivity-Overall2%

“The connection doesnt fit”

Top return reasons

Compatibility-Overall31%
Size-Overall20%
Defective Material/Parts12%
Functionality-Overall11%
Advertised Vs Actual Product9%
Sensor3%
Assembly/Installation2%
Product Condition1%
Socket/Port/Plug1%
Connectivity-Overall1%