Skip to content
60

hood struts

Worth a look

Shows a fragmented shelf (top 5 take 19% of clicks), but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 71Growth 12Conversion 59Competition 95Returns 70Price range 71Avg price 94Brand share 76Review moat 46Quality gap 23

Competition

Incredible19%

top-5 click share — an open shelf

Avg price

Great$22.63

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Brand share

Great59%

top-5 brand share — no brand owns this niche

Market size

Good$749K

$749K/yr · 656K searches

Price range

Good$5.41–$125.09

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Returns

Good2.2%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Conversion

Good5.1%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Review moat

Okay1,908.76

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Quality gap

Bad4.6★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Growth

Bad-26.3%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

Clicks spread well past the top 5 (19% combined) — an open shelf where new products get seen.

Brands

35 falling

Sellers

43

Top-5 brand share

59%

Open market

37%

  • AiYiGu20%
  • A-Premium16%
  • ARANA12%
  • ECCPP5%
  • ecocstm5%
  • Aeagle4%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%2%$15K4%$30K6%$45K8%$60K1101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 152 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -26.3% search growth over the last 90 days.
15K10KSepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Mar · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.6×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Assembly/Installation23%

“Fast install”

Size-Overall22%

“Fit like a glove”

Quality-Overall12%

“The build quality feels solid”

Value For Money8%

“Great value”

Advertised Vs Actual Product7%

“Just as described”

Efficiency6%

“Works perfectly”

Strength4%

“Super easy install, and sturdy”

Ease Of Use4%

“Easy on and work as they should”

Durability2%

“Still working good”

Shock Absorption2%

“very nice shocks easy to install nicely packed good price”

What buyers complain about

Size-Overall17%

“To short”

Instructions/User Manual/Troubleshooting7%

“Instructions are unclear”

Assembly/Installation6%

“No way of installing”

Quality-Overall6%

“Quality control has slipped”

Compatibility-Overall5%

“does not fit my ford explorer”

Durability5%

“Broke after 4 months”

Functionality-Overall4%

“They are working barely”

Advertised Vs Actual Product4%

“The item Looks nothing like the Pictures”

Mounting3%

“I have no mounting brackets for them to go into”

Strength2%

“Not strong enough”

Top return reasons

Size-Overall48%
Compatibility-Overall9%
Defective Material/Parts6%
Functionality-Overall5%
Advertised Vs Actual Product4%
Mechanism Issues2%
Assembly/Installation2%
Mounting2%
Add-Ons/Attachments2%
Value For Money2%