Skip to content
54

honda civic 2008

Worth a look

Shows no brand lock-in (top 5 brands take 39% of clicks), but weak search conversion (1.2%) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 33Growth 24Conversion 15Competition 85Returns 61Price range 40Avg price 94Brand share 95Review moat 38Quality gap 67

Brand share

Incredible39%

top-5 brand share — no brand owns this niche

Avg price

Great$47.25

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Competition

Great30%

top-5 click share — an open shelf

Quality gap

Good4.3★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Returns

Good2.5%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Price range

Okay$5.74–$217.30

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Review moat

Okay2,724.5

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Market size

Okay$155K

$155K/yr · 270K searches

Growth

Bad-2.6%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Conversion

Bad1.2%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Competition

Clicks spread well past the top 5 (30% combined) — an open shelf where new products get seen.

Brands

51 falling

Sellers

73

Top-5 brand share

39%

Open market

56%

  • USARemote14%
  • MechanMagic8%
  • ZXMOTO6%
  • ECOTRIC6%
  • ItranMc5%
  • MILD EAST5%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%2%$3K4%$6K6%$9K8%$12K1101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)1 product missing review or click data not plotted

All 68 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 96 weeks — -2.6% search growth over the last 90 days.
6K4KPrime Day '25DecMarJunAugNovMarMay

No pronounced peak months · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.2×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Size-Overall22%

“Correct Fit”

Quality-Overall16%

“Best quality”

Value For Money10%

“Good Price”

Assembly/Installation9%

“Easy assembly”

Advertised Vs Actual Product7%

“Exceeded my expectations”

Ease Of Use5%

“Easy to use”

Efficiency3%

“Effective”

Durability3%

“Well made durable product”

Strength2%

“is very sturdy”

Filtration2%

“Great filter”

What buyers complain about

Size-Overall17%

“Very big”

Durability10%

“Break easily”

Quality-Overall10%

“Cheap quality”

Compatibility-Overall6%

“Incompatible”

Value For Money3%

“A little pricey”

Strength3%

“Falls apart”

Assembly/Installation3%

“Hard to install”

Material Quality3%

“Cheap material”

Functionality-Overall3%

“case won' doesn't work”

Ease Of Use2%

“hard to look at”

Top return reasons

Size-Overall46%
Compatibility-Overall14%
Defective Material/Parts9%
Windshield Issues4%
Functionality-Overall4%
Advertised Vs Actual Product4%
Value For Money2%
Quality-Overall2%
Assembly/Installation2%
Material Quality1%