Skip to content
51

gunk engine degreaser

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.2%), but strong incumbent ratings (4.6★) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 33Growth 40Conversion 55Competition 53Returns 99Price range 74Avg price 95Brand share 27Review moat 69Quality gap 25

Returns

Incredible0.2%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Avg price

Incredible$33.30

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Good$6.32–$121.68

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Review moat

Good735.73

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Conversion

Good4.6%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Competition

Good54%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Growth

Okay+11.8%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Market size

Okay$153K

$153K/yr · 99K searches

Brand share

Okay89%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Quality gap

Okay4.6★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Competition

The top 5 products take 54% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

10 rising

Sellers

95

Top-5 brand share

89%

Open market

8%

  • Gunk51%
  • CRC22%
  • Chemical Guys8%
  • Zep4%
  • Generic4%
  • KRAKEN BOND3%
  • Open — no brand owns it (4 brands, 8%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%4%$6K8%$12K12%$18K16%$25K1101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 26 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 67 weeks — +11.8% search growth over the last 90 days.
3K2KSpike '26AprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJun

Peak months: Mar, May · busiest ÷ quietest = 2.3×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Ease Of Cleaning22%

“Cleans very nicely”

Quality-Overall17%

“Better than average”

Smell15%

“not an unpleasant smell”

Efficiency12%

“Works well”

Value For Money5%

“Great value”

Advertised Vs Actual Product5%

“Works as advertised”

Spray/Flow3%

“It gives you the impression thats its spray on”

Strength2%

“It's high powered”

Ease Of Use2%

“Easy to use”

Lubrication2%

“Its very effective—after years of oil leaks”

What buyers complain about

Ease Of Cleaning13%

“This stuff is messy”

Strength11%

“Not as strong as I would hope”

Smell10%

“Smells gross”

Functionality-Overall9%

“Not Extremely Effective”

Value For Money8%

“waste of MONEY”

Leak-Proof6%

“the bottle leaks”

Quality-Overall5%

“not very good”

Spray/Flow5%

“Dripped and leaked while spraying”

Stain Resistance3%

“Of course this product does not remove stains”

Advertised Vs Actual Product3%

“Description mentioned working on vehicles. Used on brake dust and followed instructions and then used a pressure hose and it did absolutely nothing.”

Top return reasons

Leak-Proof27%
Functionality-Overall18%
Advertised Vs Actual Product13%
Value For Money10%
Spray/Flow6%
Defective Material/Parts3%
Compatibility-Overall2%
Strength2%
Smell2%
Ease Of Cleaning2%