Skip to content
55

gasket scraper

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.7%), but soft demand (-9.0% this quarter) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 35Growth 20Conversion 77Competition 47Returns 96Price range 77Avg price 86Brand share 64Review moat 54Quality gap 47

Returns

Incredible0.7%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Avg price

Great$19.53

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Conversion

Great7.5%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Price range

Great$7.33–$40.62

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Brand share

Good67%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Review moat

Good1,342.16

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Competition

Okay57%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Quality gap

Okay4.5★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Market size

Okay$168K

$168K/yr · 115K searches

Growth

Bad-9.0%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

The top 5 products take 57% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

22 rising

Sellers

97

Top-5 brand share

67%

Open market

29%

  • OUXIO24%
  • OEMTOOLS16%
  • MTNZXZ10%
  • DURATECH9%
  • GEARWRENCH8%
  • Lisle4%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%4%$7K8%$13K12%$20K16%$27K1101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 25 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -9.0% search growth over the last 90 days.
4K3KSpike '24Spike '25Holiday '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

No pronounced peak months · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.5×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Quality-Overall20%

“A good quality tool”

Ease Of Use15%

“So handy for so many reasons”

Value For Money15%

“they were inexpensive”

Ease Of Cleaning7%

“Easy cleanup”

Advertised Vs Actual Product6%

“Just as Advertised”

Durability5%

“It still looks like new after regular use”

Strength4%

“Sturdy tool”

Sharpness4%

“Easy to sharpen”

Grip3%

“have a comfortable grip on them as well”

Adhesion/Stickiness2%

“Work well getting stickers off windows”

What buyers complain about

Quality-Overall20%

“Quality control problems”

Durability12%

“Not durable”

Sharpness7%

“Dont hold the blades”

Functionality-Overall6%

“Awful does not work well”

Material Quality6%

“Cheap material”

Strength5%

“They dont feel as sturdy as I expected”

Value For Money4%

“No wonder it was so cheap”

Ease Of Use3%

“is terrible in use”

Defective Material/Parts2%

“defective”

Product Condition2%

“I ordered brand new ones and the one I received look used all scratched up and have grease on them and fingerprints”

Top return reasons

Functionality-Overall19%
Size-Overall13%
Advertised Vs Actual Product8%
Sharpness7%
Strength7%
Quality-Overall7%
Defective Material/Parts7%
Value For Money6%
Material Quality4%
Durability4%