Skip to content
62

gas cap

Worth a look

Shows a fragmented shelf (top 5 take 24% of clicks), but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 71Growth 19Conversion 63Competition 91Returns 49Price range 73Avg price 43Brand share 70Review moat 53Quality gap 76

Competition

Great24%

top-5 click share — an open shelf

Quality gap

Great4.3★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Price range

Good$5.38–$40.50

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Market size

Good$768K

$768K/yr · 1.2M searches

Brand share

Good63%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Conversion

Good5.6%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Review moat

Good1,378.32

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Returns

Okay3.1%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Avg price

Okay$11.19

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Growth

Bad-11.3%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

Clicks spread well past the top 5 (24% combined) — an open shelf where new products get seen.

Brands

36 falling

Sellers

111

Top-5 brand share

63%

Open market

33%

  • ROVIKE28%
  • Manymiba21%
  • Gates7%
  • GM GENUINE PARTS4%
  • Anleecap4%
  • Eponcia3%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%3%$23K6%$46K9%$69K12%$92K1101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 77 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -11.3% search growth over the last 90 days.
25K15KSepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

No pronounced peak months · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.3×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Size-Overall47%

“Fit like a glove”

Quality-Overall12%

“Excellent Product”

Value For Money8%

“Great Value”

Advertised Vs Actual Product8%

“As advertised”

Efficiency5%

“Worked Out of the Box”

Fuel Efficiency5%

“Fuel capacity fits and functions well”

Assembly/Installation5%

“Less than 5 min install”

Leak-Proof1%

“works great with no air leaks”

Maintenance And Repair1%

“It was a good temporary fix”

Ease Of Use1%

“Simple to use”

What buyers complain about

Size-Overall22%

“Didn't fit”

Compatibility-Overall18%

“Works but wouldnt fit the connector”

Durability8%

“Broke after the first use”

Functionality-Overall8%

“not functional”

Quality-Overall7%

“Cord is not great quality”

Leak-Proof6%

“Immediately leaked”

Advertised Vs Actual Product3%

“Incorrect description”

Value For Money2%

“$35 cheaper”

Touch/Button Controls2%

“this doesn't even do a single click”

Ease Of Use2%

“Not easy to open”

Top return reasons

Size-Overall56%
Compatibility-Overall17%
Functionality-Overall8%
Defective Material/Parts4%
Advertised Vs Actual Product4%
Leak-Proof2%
Value For Money2%
Mechanism Issues1%
Assembly/Installation1%
Product Condition1%