Skip to content
69

fuel filter

Worth a look

Shows a sweet-spot price point ($22.58 avg), but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 90Growth 23Conversion 57Competition 90Returns 90Price range 68Avg price 94Brand share 87Review moat 69Quality gap 38

Avg price

Great$22.58

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Market size

Great$1.7M

$1.7M/yr · 1.6M searches

Competition

Great25%

top-5 click share — an open shelf

Returns

Great1.2%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Brand share

Great48%

top-5 brand share — no brand owns this niche

Review moat

Good721.63

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Price range

Good$5.08–$129.55

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Conversion

Good4.8%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Quality gap

Okay4.5★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Growth

Bad-4.5%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

Clicks spread well past the top 5 (25% combined) — an open shelf where new products get seen.

Brands

48 rising

Sellers

184

Top-5 brand share

48%

Open market

48%

  • K&N13%
  • Wix12%
  • Purolator9%
  • GM GENUINE PARTS8%
  • CocoMocart6%
  • Motorcraft4%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%2%$34K4%$69K6%$103K8%$138K1101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 104 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -4.5% search growth over the last 90 days.
35K25KSepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

No pronounced peak months · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.3×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Size-Overall20%

“Fit as it should”

Filtration19%

“the air filter for perfect”

Quality-Overall14%

“Decent quality”

Value For Money13%

“Great Value”

Advertised Vs Actual Product9%

“Just as described”

Assembly/Installation5%

“installed without any issues”

Fuel Efficiency4%

“fuel no problem”

Efficiency3%

“The clear filter helps keep an eye on debris”

Leak-Proof2%

“Does not leak”

Ease Of Use1%

“Easy and works great”

What buyers complain about

Filtration18%

“Filter are junk”

Leak-Proof13%

“Leaked”

Quality-Overall13%

“no quality control”

Size-Overall12%

“Too Long”

Durability6%

“Cracks easily”

Fuel Efficiency5%

“Not for gasoline”

Compatibility-Overall3%

“does not fit 2011-2015 mustangs”

Advertised Vs Actual Product3%

“False advertising”

Value For Money2%

“expensive”

Assembly/Installation1%

“Can not install”

Top return reasons

Size-Overall45%
Filtration20%
Compatibility-Overall12%
Advertised Vs Actual Product5%
Defective Material/Parts4%
Value For Money3%
Leak-Proof2%
Functionality-Overall1%
Assembly/Installation1%
Fuel Efficiency1%