Skip to content
51

fram ph8170

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.6%), but strong incumbent ratings (4.8★) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 31Growth 76Conversion 86Competition 23Returns 97Price range 62Avg price 95Brand share 19Review moat 44Quality gap 13

Returns

Incredible0.6%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Avg price

Incredible$25.85

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Conversion

Great9.7%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Growth

Great+61.3%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Price range

Good$9.43–$146.52

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Review moat

Okay2,098.85

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Market size

Okay$140K

$140K/yr · 56K searches

Competition

Bad73%

top-5 click share — a locked-up shelf

Brand share

Bad92%

top-5 brand share — brand-locked demand

Quality gap

Bad4.8★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Competition

The top 5 products capture 73% of clicks — a locked-up shelf that new listings rarely crack.

Brands

7 rising

Sellers

110

Top-5 brand share

92%

Open market

2%

  • Wix54%
  • Briggs & Stratton13%
  • ECOGARD11%
  • Fram9%
  • Reliable Aftermarket Parts Our Name Says It All6%
  • Kawasaki5%
  • Open — no brand owns it (1 brand, 2%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%10%$14K20%$28K30%$42K40%$56K1101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 13 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 10 weeks — +61.3% search growth over the last 90 days.
2K2KMay '26May '26May '26May '26May '26Jun '26Jun '26Jun '26Jun '26Jul '26

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Filtration21%

“Great filter”

Size-Overall21%

“Fit great”

Advertised Vs Actual Product14%

“As advertised”

Quality-Overall14%

“Excellent product”

Value For Money14%

“Worth the $”

Assembly/Installation3%

“Easy to install”

Correct Contents2%

“correct part”

Motor Power2%

“They fit most 14hp to 18hp engines”

Maintenance And Repair1%

“Im happy I included it in my routine maintenance”

Efficiency1%

“Works fine”

What buyers complain about

Advertised Vs Actual Product21%

“Picture does not match the product delivered”

Filtration19%

“tossed the filter in the trash”

Size-Overall14%

“Shorter”

Leak-Proof6%

“This filter leaked”

Value For Money6%

“These may a little more costly than copies”

Compatibility-Overall5%

“This did not fit my 98 dodge Dakota 318”

Defective Material/Parts2%

“would not screw on”

Material Quality2%

“feels a little cheap in the hand”

Grip2%

“I was a bit worried about getting a good grip to install it”

Thickness2%

“I do wish the outer casing felt a bit thicker though”

Top return reasons

Size-Overall42%
Filtration28%
Advertised Vs Actual Product10%
Compatibility-Overall7%
Defective Material/Parts4%
Value For Money3%
Product Condition2%
Functionality-Overall1%
Motor Issues1%
Ethically/Sustainably Sourced1%