Skip to content
51

filter blaster

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.5%), but a concentrated shelf (top 5 take 79% of clicks) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 25Growth 57Conversion 56Competition 18Returns 98Price range 26Avg price 69Brand share 26Review moat 79Quality gap 94

Returns

Incredible0.5%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Quality gap

Great4.0★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Review moat

Great419.46

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Avg price

Good$116.91

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Growth

Good+31.9%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Conversion

Good4.7%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Brand share

Okay89%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Price range

Okay$23.20–$322.08

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Market size

Okay$101K

$101K/yr · 18K searches

Competition

Bad79%

top-5 click share — a locked-up shelf

Competition

The top 5 products capture 79% of clicks — a locked-up shelf that new listings rarely crack.

Brands

8 falling

Sellers

25

Top-5 brand share

89%

Open market

7%

  • Pete Industries26%
  • Air Filter Blaster22%
  • APPLIED BIOCHEMISTS19%
  • Katywixu16%
  • Threlaco6%
  • --4%
  • Open — no brand owns it (2 brands, 7%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%10%$10K20%$20K30%$30K40%$40K1101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 13 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 53 weeks — +31.9% search growth over the last 90 days.
1K600Prime Day '25Spike '25Holiday '25Spike '26JulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJun

Peak months: Apr, Oct · busiest ÷ quietest = 2.3×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Ease Of Cleaning21%

“It made cleaning out all of our filters easier”

Value For Money21%

“Good for the price”

Filtration17%

“This plus the water comb I used got my filters looking like new again”

Quality-Overall13%

“Good product”

Compactness7%

“Perfect for compacts”

Durability5%

“Will blow the dust into another county, very durable, works perfect for all of my heavy machinery”

Design-Overall3%

“Well designed”

Assembly/Installation3%

“Very impressed with this set up”

Advertised Vs Actual Product3%

“Works as advertised”

Efficiency3%

“Works amazing”

What buyers complain about

Filtration17%

“This did not work for my cartridge filters”

Quality-Overall17%

“Not very good at all”

Functionality-Overall13%

“does not work”

Size-Overall8%

“works ok sloppy fittings if you tighten it up then they dont plug in”

Pressure8%

“Considerably Lowered the psi with little effort”

Instructions/User Manual/Troubleshooting4%

“Wish there were instructions on how to do it”

Advertised Vs Actual Product4%

“Simply does not work as advertised”

Color4%

“there was zero change to the color. yellow”

Material Quality4%

“Junk material”

Leak-Proof4%

“water leaks out”

Top return reasons

Filtration38%
Leak-Proof11%
Size-Overall10%
Value For Money8%
Advertised Vs Actual Product7%
Functionality-Overall6%
Compatibility-Overall6%
Defective Material/Parts4%
Quality-Overall2%
Durability2%