Skip to content
50

coolant vacuum refill kit

Worth a look

Shows a sweet-spot price point ($50.72 avg), but soft demand (-21.0% this quarter) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 58Growth 14Conversion 22Competition 65Returns 46Price range 63Avg price 93Brand share 51Review moat 56Quality gap 67

Avg price

Great$50.72

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Quality gap

Good4.3★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Competition

Good46%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Price range

Good$14.81–$150.45

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Market size

Good$461K

$461K/yr · 528K searches

Review moat

Good1,264.41

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Brand share

Good75%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Returns

Okay3.4%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Conversion

Bad1.7%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Growth

Bad-21.0%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

The top 5 products take 46% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

17 falling

Sellers

64

Top-5 brand share

75%

Open market

20%

  • Orion Motor Tech33%
  • OEMTOOLS25%
  • UView6%
  • BILITOOLS6%
  • CXPRO5%
  • DAYUAN5%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%4%$18K8%$37K12%$55K16%$74K1101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 34 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -21.0% search growth over the last 90 days.
9K7KPrime Day '24Holiday '24Spike '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Jul · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.9×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Quality-Overall20%

“nice quality set”

Ease Of Use10%

“Pretty handy”

Value For Money9%

“Great Value”

Coolant9%

“worked well for my coolant change”

Efficiency7%

“Works ok”

Advertised Vs Actual Product7%

“As advertised”

Leak-Proof6%

“Did not leak”

Size-Overall6%

“Excellent fit”

Durability2%

“Worked very well, durable and easy storage”

Pressure2%

“it held pressure consistently during testing”

What buyers complain about

Quality-Overall13%

“Cheap quality”

Leak-Proof12%

“leaking”

Compatibility-Overall12%

“adapters that were not compatible”

Size-Overall7%

“Not large enough”

Coolant6%

“leaked coolant everywhere”

Pressure5%

“Does not pressurize system”

Functionality-Overall4%

“Did not work as stated”

Instructions/User Manual/Troubleshooting4%

“Terrible Instructions”

Value For Money3%

“Not even worth any money”

Advertised Vs Actual Product2%

“Was not advertised as such though”

Top return reasons

Size-Overall20%
Compatibility-Overall18%
Coolant13%
Defective Material/Parts8%
Functionality-Overall7%
Leak-Proof6%
Pressure5%
Advertised Vs Actual Product4%
Value For Money4%
Add-Ons/Attachments2%