Skip to content

collapsible trash can

Worth a look58/100

collapsible trash can shows low returns (2.3%), but a small market ($627K/yr) keeps it on the watch list.

Market/yr

$627K

Growth (1y)

+208.9%

Products

40

Brands

24

was 22 a year ago

Sellers

106

Price range

$7.75–$42.25

Returns

2.3%

Rating

4.4★

58/100

Worth a look

Scored 58/100 across market size, growth, competition, quality gap, and returns.

Market sizeGrowthCompetitionQuality gapReturns
Market size
27
×0.30
Growth
78
×0.30
Competition
65
×0.20
Quality gap
54
×0.10
Returns
81
×0.10

Demand

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +208.9% year over year.
39K20KSpike '25Prime Day '25Spike '26Jul '24Nov '24Mar '25Jul '25Nov '25Mar '26

Seasonality

Monthly demand index across the year — 1.00 is average.

Peak months: May, Jun, Jul, Aug · busiest ÷ quietest = 4.1×

Competition

36%Wakeman
  • Wakeman36%
  • Coghlan's18%
  • Camco6%
  • Fiskars6%
  • Ginsco4%
  • Leinoupt3%
  • Other (18 brands)26%

The top 5 products take 46% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them. 24 brands and 106 sellers compete here.

Brands

24 rising

was 22 a year ago

Sellers

106

Top 5 brand share

70%

#ProductBrandPriceRatingReviewsClick shareTrend

Product shelf

All 40 tracked products in this niche.

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Ease Of Use14%

“Makes life easier”

Size-Overall12%

“a great size”

Quality-Overall9%

“But its great quality holds up gravel”

Storage Capacity7%

“easy storage”

Durability6%

“held up very well”

Strength6%

“This is very sturdy”

Ease Of Cleaning6%

“Cleans up easily”

Advertised Vs Actual Product5%

“As advertised”

Value For Money5%

“Good Price”

Weight Light3%

“Good for light weight garden waste”

What buyers complain about

Size-Overall18%

“This one is a little larger”

Durability18%

“Falls apart quickly”

Strength11%

“Flimsy”

Quality-Overall10%

“Probably too pricy for the quality”

Stitch/Finish/Polish5%

“this is a hole at the seam”

Ease Of Use4%

“making it nearly impossible to pull out”

Design-Overall3%

“But Has a Design Flaw”

Value For Money3%

“This was double the price”

Advertised Vs Actual Product2%

“Poor advertising”

Thickness2%

“Its more thicker”

Top return reasons

  • Size-Overall53%
  • Strength7%
  • Bin Capacity6%
  • Advertised Vs Actual Product5%
  • Material Quality4%
  • Functionality-Overall4%
  • Quality-Overall3%
  • Defective Material/Parts3%
  • Value For Money3%
  • Stitch/Finish/Polish2%

Data scraped July 9, 2026 · Marketplace baseline: 4.4★ avg rating · $22.79 median price · 2.2% median returns across 14,944 tracked niches.