Skip to content
61

collapsible dish tub

Launch it

A $1.1M/yr market growing +14.5% this quarter with returns at 2.3% — clears our launch bar.

Market size 80Growth 43Conversion 51Competition 72Returns 69Price range 63Avg price 77Brand share 77Review moat 42Quality gap 25

Market size

Great$1.1M

$1.1M/yr · 1.8M searches

Brand share

Great58%

top-5 brand share — no brand owns this niche

Avg price

Great$15.71

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Competition

Good42%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Returns

Good2.3%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Price range

Good$8.85–$25.51

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Conversion

Good4.1%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Growth

Okay+14.5%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Review moat

Okay2,287.46

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Quality gap

Okay4.6★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Competition

The top 5 products take 42% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

25 rising

Sellers

109

Top-5 brand share

58%

Open market

35%

  • GIMWA16%
  • FOSJGO13%
  • Tiawudi12%
  • Tribello9%
  • Sterilite7%
  • Goderewild7%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%4%$46K8%$91K12%$137K16%$182K101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 41 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +14.5% search growth over the last 90 days.
45K35KPrime Day '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Jun, Jul · busiest ÷ quietest = 2.0×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Size-Overall12%

“The size is perfect for daily use”

Quality-Overall11%

“Excellent product”

Ease Of Use10%

“easy to clean”

Ease Of Cleaning8%

“Easy to clean”

Storage Capacity8%

“Easy storage”

Advertised Vs Actual Product7%

“As described”

Strength7%

“The materials feel sturdy”

Value For Money4%

“Good price”

Durability4%

“it still looks brand new”

Washability4%

“Perfect for Washing baby bottles”

What buyers complain about

Size-Overall21%

“Pretty Small”

Leak-Proof11%

“It leaks”

Durability8%

“Broke”

Strength7%

“Flimsy plastic”

Quality-Overall6%

“Horrible quality”

Value For Money5%

“Way, way overpriced”

Ease Of Cleaning3%

“Not easy to clean”

Thickness3%

“they are not deep enough”

Water Resistance3%

“Water fell everywhere”

Material Quality3%

“Cheap material”

Top return reasons

Size-Overall71%
Value For Money4%
Advertised Vs Actual Product4%
Material Quality3%
Leak-Proof3%
Strength2%
Quality-Overall2%
Functionality-Overall2%
Defective Material/Parts1%
Water Resistance1%