Skip to content
62

coleman pop up parts

Worth a look

Shows demand growing +123.3% this quarter, but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 10Growth 95Conversion 25Competition 86Returns 52Price range 17Avg price 95Brand share 90Review moat 69Quality gap 78

Growth

Incredible+123.3%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Avg price

Incredible$32.02

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Brand share

Great45%

top-5 brand share — no brand owns this niche

Competition

Great29%

top-5 click share — an open shelf

Quality gap

Great4.3★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Review moat

Good753.72

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Returns

Good2.9%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Conversion

Okay2.0%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Price range

Bad$5.30–$508.68

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Market size

Bad$39K

$39K/yr · 60K searches

Competition

Clicks spread well past the top 5 (29% combined) — an open shelf where new products get seen.

Brands

45 falling

Sellers

133

Top-5 brand share

45%

Open market

52%

  • JR Products25%
  • Generic6%
  • seork5%
  • JTEYINH5%
  • VIDABTE4%
  • Lesiyou3%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%2%$7784%$2K6%$2K8%$3K1101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)3 products missing review or click data not plotted

All 60 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 96 weeks — +123.3% search growth over the last 90 days.
2K2KSpike '25Prime Day '25Spike '26DecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: May, Jun, Jul, Aug, Sep · busiest ÷ quietest = 4.6×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Size-Overall20%

“Fit perfect and change out was easy”

Assembly/Installation20%

“Easy install”

Quality-Overall15%

“Solid quality”

Advertised Vs Actual Product9%

“As advertised”

Value For Money7%

“Well worth the money”

Efficiency6%

“Simple RV upgrade that makes a big difference — closes door perfectly”

Ease Of Use4%

“Perfect for its use”

Durability3%

“Durable”

Strength2%

“Stronger and More Secure Than the Originals”

Design-Overall2%

“Like the design”

What buyers complain about

Durability15%

“Breaks easily”

Size-Overall15%

“Too Small”

Quality-Overall13%

“the quality control needs improvement”

Adhesion/Stickiness9%

“Didn't stick well”

Functionality-Overall8%

“It was NOT efficient at all for our camper”

Advertised Vs Actual Product5%

“Misleading”

Assembly/Installation3%

“NO instructions for newbies - easy to install, just saying”

Mounting3%

“without reinforcement on back of mounting flange screws would tend to indent the mounting flange”

Metal Quality2%

“I had to remove this due to the metal cracking around the screws”

Measurement/Reading Accuracy2%

“Posted measurements are not accurate”

Top return reasons

Size-Overall56%
Compatibility-Overall9%
Defective Material/Parts5%
Advertised Vs Actual Product4%
Functionality-Overall4%
Windshield Issues3%
Mechanism Issues2%
Value For Money2%
Assembly/Installation2%
Quality-Overall1%