Skip to content
47

cat oil filter

Skip it

Soft demand (-1.2% this quarter) — this niche doesn't clear our bar today.

Market size 28Growth 24Conversion 74Competition 29Returns 83Price range 66Avg price 88Brand share 27Review moat 91Quality gap 45

Review moat

Great185.47

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Avg price

Great$65.06

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Returns

Great1.6%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Conversion

Good6.9%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Price range

Good$24.84–$139.20

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Quality gap

Okay4.5★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Competition

Okay68%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Market size

Okay$118K

$118K/yr · 26K searches

Brand share

Okay89%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Growth

Bad-1.2%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

The top 5 products take 68% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

9 rising

Sellers

26

Top-5 brand share

89%

Open market

8%

  • CAT67%
  • Lesurey7%
  • DEEFILL6%
  • GETOPAUTO6%
  • EKZFAZA4%
  • AULDAY3%
  • Open — no brand owns it (3 brands, 8%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%10%$12K20%$24K30%$36K40%$47K1101001K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)1 product missing review or click data not plotted

All 15 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 40 weeks — -1.2% search growth over the last 90 days.
600400Oct '25Nov '25Dec '25Feb '26Mar '26May '26Jun '26

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Filtration34%

“Fit and quality of filtering”

Advertised Vs Actual Product17%

“Works as advertised-great product”

Value For Money17%

“Great price”

Size-Overall13%

“Fits properly”

Quality-Overall11%

“Great product”

Assembly/Installation3%

“Very easy install”

Ease Of Use2%

“easy”

What buyers complain about

Pressure33%

“lost 7 psi of oil pressure”

Filtration17%

“Last 2 I purchased had problems with fuel filter sucking air”

Paint Quality17%

“chipped paint”

Leak-Proof17%

“Leaks”

Top return reasons

Size-Overall50%
Compatibility-Overall19%
Filtration16%
Advertised Vs Actual Product4%
Assembly/Installation3%
Defective Material/Parts2%
Functionality-Overall2%
Value For Money2%
Leak-Proof1%
Mechanism Issues0%