Skip to content
52

696854 briggs and stratton oil filter

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.5%), but strong incumbent ratings (4.8★) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 21Growth 84Conversion 92Competition 25Returns 97Price range 76Avg price 81Brand share 21Review moat 48Quality gap 16

Returns

Incredible0.5%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Conversion

Great11.2%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Growth

Great+83.0%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Avg price

Great$17.51

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Great$7.67–$38.76

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Review moat

Okay1,656

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Competition

Bad70%

top-5 click share — a locked-up shelf

Market size

Bad$85K

$85K/yr · 43K searches

Brand share

Bad91%

top-5 brand share — brand-locked demand

Quality gap

Bad4.8★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Competition

The top 5 products capture 70% of clicks — a locked-up shelf that new listings rarely crack.

Brands

7 flat

Sellers

39

Top-5 brand share

91%

Open market

2%

  • Briggs & Stratton49%
  • HOODELL17%
  • Harbot10%
  • Venseri8%
  • Deflife8%
  • RALBDX7%
  • Open — no brand owns it (1 brand, 2%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%10%$8K20%$17K30%$25K40%$34K101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 11 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +83.0% search growth over the last 90 days.
6K4KSpike '24Black Friday '24Spike '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Mar, Apr, May · busiest ÷ quietest = 9.6×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Size-Overall31%

“Fit great”

Quality-Overall18%

“Good quality”

Value For Money18%

“Worth the buy”

Advertised Vs Actual Product14%

“As advertised”

Filtration6%

“Great Filter For What I Needed It for”

Correct Contents3%

“Parts”

Leak-Proof2%

“No leaks”

Efficiency2%

“Works well”

Ease Of Use1%

“Simple and easy”

Assembly/Installation1%

“Easy to install”

What buyers complain about

Filtration29%

“I will look for a longer filter as the short filter is almost impossible to remove”

Leak-Proof13%

“A hairline crack which leaked gasoline”

Size-Overall12%

“was shorter than one on the mower”

Socket/Port/Plug7%

“Spark plugs no good”

Functionality-Overall7%

“0 how about this every year for my lawn mower it's very good except the spark plugs you really don't work”

Metal Quality2%

“Also the filter metal is so thin the strap or plier type tools crush the filter”

Value For Money2%

“Only small letdown is the price feels a bit high for something this simple”

Ease Of Use2%

“difficult to remove”

Jamming/Clogging2%

“I see a LOT of glue again at the bottom, substantially more than needed, which risks breaking off and clogging things”

Quality-Overall2%

“Not OEM quality”

Top return reasons

Size-Overall50%
Filtration25%
Compatibility-Overall8%
Advertised Vs Actual Product8%
Product Condition3%
Defective Material/Parts3%
Functionality-Overall1%
Value For Money1%
Shape/Style1%
Maintenance And Repair1%