Skip to content
62

5.3 oil filter

Worth a look

Shows low returns (1.0%), but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 52Growth 83Conversion 45Competition 56Returns 95Price range 82Avg price 92Brand share 17Review moat 63Quality gap 57

Returns

Great1.0%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Avg price

Great$21.92

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Growth

Great+80.3%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Price range

Great$4.41–$105.47

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Review moat

Good986.7

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Quality gap

Good4.4★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Competition

Good52%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Market size

Good$332K

$332K/yr · 419K searches

Conversion

Okay3.6%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Brand share

Bad93%

top-5 brand share — brand-locked demand

Competition

The top 5 products take 52% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

10 rising

Sellers

110

Top-5 brand share

93%

Open market

5%

  • ACDelco61%
  • Wix17%
  • Jaxivo6%
  • Struggling5%
  • Purolator4%
  • Myreko2%
  • Open — no brand owns it (4 brands, 5%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%5%$17K10%$33K15%$50K20%$66K1101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 30 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 31 weeks — +80.3% search growth over the last 90 days.
15K10KSpike '26Dec '25Jan '26Feb '26Mar '26Apr '26May '26

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Filtration29%

“Great filter”

Size-Overall19%

“Fits fine”

Value For Money15%

“Best value”

Quality-Overall14%

“the build quality is exceptional”

Advertised Vs Actual Product8%

“As advertised”

Efficiency2%

“keeps my vehicles running extremely well”

Assembly/Installation2%

“Easy Install”

Locally Manufactured1%

“O E M product American made”

Pressure1%

“The filter will do the job the oil pressure was right on”

Design-Overall1%

“Inside the design is different from other brands that's the reason it's more efficient”

What buyers complain about

Filtration18%

“Useless filters”

Size-Overall14%

“Didn't fit my vehicle”

Quality-Overall11%

“Bad quality control”

Compatibility-Overall9%

“Not even remotely close to what I need or fits my vehicle even though it said it did”

Leak-Proof7%

“They leak”

Advertised Vs Actual Product5%

“False information”

Product Condition3%

“Used item”

Metal Quality3%

“Threads had metal shavings on them do not use”

Value For Money3%

“Verry cheap”

Paint Quality2%

“In short, flaking paint can be seen on the body of the filter inside the gasket which seems like it could easily flake further and get into my oil”

Top return reasons

Size-Overall43%
Filtration21%
Compatibility-Overall15%
Advertised Vs Actual Product5%
Product Condition3%
Defective Material/Parts3%
Value For Money2%
Paint Quality1%
Quality-Overall1%
Leak-Proof1%