Skip to content
52

285/75r16

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.2%), but prices mostly outside the sweet spot ($135.89–$873.69) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 67Growth 22Conversion 6Competition 78Returns 99Price range 0Avg price 23Brand share 89Review moat 89Quality gap 23

Returns

Incredible0.2%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Brand share

Great46%

top-5 brand share — no brand owns this niche

Review moat

Great212.36

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Competition

Great37%

top-5 click share — an open shelf

Market size

Good$671K

$671K/yr · 396K searches

Quality gap

Bad4.6★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Avg price

Bad$353.23

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Growth

Bad-5.9%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Conversion

Bad0.5%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Price range

Bad$135.89–$873.69

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Competition

Clicks spread well past the top 5 (37% combined) — an open shelf where new products get seen.

Brands

28 falling

Sellers

44

Top-5 brand share

46%

Open market

48%

  • Thunderer17%
  • Accelera8%
  • Milestar8%
  • Evoluxx6%
  • Mastertrack6%
  • Atturo6%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%3%$20K6%$40K9%$60K12%$81K1101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)4 products missing review or click data not plotted

All 47 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 102 weeks — -5.9% search growth over the last 90 days.
9K7KDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

No pronounced peak months · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.3×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Wheel Quality39%

“Great tires”

Value For Money26%

“Great value”

Quality-Overall13%

“Good looking Tires”

Grip5%

“They grip very very well”

Durability4%

“Durable”

Tread Pattern Pitch3%

“The tread is nice and mild looking”

Size-Overall3%

“Fit and balanced”

Friction2%

“Have had these tires on my Jeep JKU for a while good traction not loud road noise good tire all around”

Compatibility-Overall2%

“Fits perfectly in my Hummer H3”

Strength1%

“Sturdy, good looking tire”

What buyers complain about

Durability39%

“Ripped apart after 30 miles”

Quality-Overall33%

“Junk”

Weight Heavy17%

“Took alot of weight to balance 2 tires”

Top return reasons

Size-Overall55%
Functionality-Overall11%
Compatibility-Overall9%
Quality-Overall7%
Strength7%
Advertised Vs Actual Product5%
Value For Money2%
Durability2%
Maintenance And Repair2%