Skip to content
52

275/65r18

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.1%), but prices mostly outside the sweet spot ($111.94–$789.94) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 62Growth 27Conversion 6Competition 78Returns 99Price range 0Avg price 29Brand share 87Review moat 83Quality gap 24

Returns

Incredible0.1%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Brand share

Great48%

top-5 brand share — no brand owns this niche

Review moat

Great338.23

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Competition

Great37%

top-5 click share — an open shelf

Market size

Good$546K

$546K/yr · 371K searches

Avg price

Okay$313.06

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Growth

Okay+1.7%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Quality gap

Bad4.6★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Conversion

Bad0.5%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Price range

Bad$111.94–$789.94

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Competition

Clicks spread well past the top 5 (37% combined) — an open shelf where new products get seen.

Brands

29 rising

Sellers

35

Top-5 brand share

48%

Open market

46%

  • TRAVELSTAR13%
  • Goodyear12%
  • CROSSWIND9%
  • Finalist8%
  • Mastertrack7%
  • Prinx6%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%3%$16K6%$33K9%$49K12%$66K1101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)5 products missing review or click data not plotted

All 48 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +1.7% search growth over the last 90 days.
10K6KPrime Day '25Spike '25SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

No pronounced peak months · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.4×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Wheel Quality37%

“Great looking tires, great deal”

Value For Money29%

“Great price”

Quality-Overall13%

“Good quality”

Friction6%

“Good traction”

Size-Overall6%

“Perfect fit”

Tread Pattern Pitch3%

“The tread design looks awesome”

Functionality-Overall2%

“Rides perfect”

Thickness1%

“they have thick side walls so Im expecting them to handle heavy weight”

Assembly/Installation1%

“Installer was very professional”

Advertised Vs Actual Product1%

“As expected”

What buyers complain about

Quality-Overall50%

“Junk”

Value For Money40%

“Hell of a price”

Advertised Vs Actual Product10%

“They are not like the picture”

Top return reasons

Size-Overall52%
Advertised Vs Actual Product22%
Functionality-Overall12%
Compatibility-Overall7%
Value For Money5%
Assembly/Installation2%