Skip to content
57

275/55r20

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.4%), but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 77Growth 25Conversion 7Competition 88Returns 98Price range 0Avg price 35Brand share 95Review moat 87Quality gap 24

Returns

Incredible0.4%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Brand share

Incredible39%

top-5 brand share — no brand owns this niche

Competition

Great27%

top-5 click share — an open shelf

Review moat

Great262.86

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Market size

Great$957K

$957K/yr · 668K searches

Avg price

Okay$275.59

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Growth

Bad-0.3%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Quality gap

Bad4.6★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Conversion

Bad0.5%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Price range

Bad$113.06–$758.91

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Competition

Clicks spread well past the top 5 (27% combined) — an open shelf where new products get seen.

Brands

40 rising

Sellers

41

Top-5 brand share

39%

Open market

57%

  • Fullway11%
  • TRAVELSTAR9%
  • Evoluxx7%
  • Armstrong7%
  • Cosmo Tires5%
  • Prinx4%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%3%$29K6%$57K9%$86K12%$115K1101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)4 products missing review or click data not plotted

All 59 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -0.3% search growth over the last 90 days.
18K13KPrime Day '25Spike '25SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

No pronounced peak months · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.3×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Wheel Quality34%

“Like the tires”

Value For Money24%

“Great value for money”

Quality-Overall20%

“Good quality”

Size-Overall4%

“Perfect fit”

Tread Pattern Pitch4%

“Good tread”

Advertised Vs Actual Product3%

“As advertised”

Grip3%

“Seem to have good grip”

Friction2%

“Awesome tires on F 150”

Durability2%

“For durable”

Product Condition1%

“After 15000 miles still like new”

What buyers complain about

Value For Money38%

“These tires are not worth 5 cents”

Quality-Overall31%

“Complete garbage products”

Durability17%

“Exploded on me 2 months after installing”

Top return reasons

Size-Overall71%
Value For Money10%
Advertised Vs Actual Product6%
Compatibility-Overall6%
Functionality-Overall4%
Assembly/Installation3%
Durability1%
Pressure1%
Color0%