Skip to content
54

245/75 17 truck tires

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.2%), but prices mostly outside the sweet spot ($108.56–$669.39) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 42Growth 30Conversion 15Competition 79Returns 99Price range 0Avg price 43Brand share 91Review moat 86Quality gap 48

Returns

Incredible0.2%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Brand share

Great44%

top-5 brand share — no brand owns this niche

Review moat

Great282.48

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Competition

Great36%

top-5 click share — an open shelf

Quality gap

Okay4.5★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Avg price

Okay$222.56

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Market size

Okay$217K

$217K/yr · 80K searches

Growth

Okay+4.0%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Conversion

Bad1.2%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Price range

Bad$108.56–$669.39

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Competition

Clicks spread well past the top 5 (36% combined) — an open shelf where new products get seen.

Brands

33 rising

Sellers

37

Top-5 brand share

44%

Open market

52%

  • Armstrong11%
  • TRAVELSTAR9%
  • Milestar8%
  • Ironman8%
  • Thunderer8%
  • Prinx4%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%3%$7K6%$13K9%$20K12%$26K1101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)5 products missing review or click data not plotted

All 50 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 103 weeks — +4.0% search growth over the last 90 days.
2K2KSpike '24Spike '25DecMarJunAugNovMarMay

No pronounced peak months · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.4×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Quality-Overall40%

“this is a quality tire”

Value For Money13%

“Great tires for the price”

Friction10%

“They work good they hold up to 2 tons in the beds of our dually really well have pretty traction compared to the Firestone HT we had on it before I would definitely get them balanced though or bagged they shake if you dont”

Wheel Quality10%

“Great Tires”

Weight Heavy7%

“Heavy duty tire”

Maintenance And Repair7%

“are getting replaced”

Size-Overall3%

“They will fit perfectly even the recommended are different size”

Tread Pattern Pitch3%

“with a very deep tread”

Strength3%

“These are solid heavy duty for F150”

Comfort-Overall3%

“Bought for my nissan cargo van they ride very comfortable”

What buyers complain about

Quality-Overall38%

“Poor quality tires”

Maintenance And Repair25%

“have already had to replace 2 of them”

Advertised Vs Actual Product13%

“Completely false listing”

Value For Money13%

“Wasnt expecting much for the price”

Weight Light13%

“both say the side walls are not heavy enough”

Top return reasons

Size-Overall69%
Advertised Vs Actual Product19%
Functionality-Overall6%
Weight Heavy3%
Assembly/Installation1%
Compatibility-Overall1%