Skip to content
53

235/65r18

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.1%), but prices mostly outside the sweet spot ($84.22–$567.02) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 47Growth 51Conversion 9Competition 69Returns 99Price range 3Avg price 45Brand share 76Review moat 68Quality gap 35

Returns

Incredible0.1%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Brand share

Great59%

top-5 brand share — no brand owns this niche

Competition

Good44%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Review moat

Good778.43

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Growth

Good+21.3%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Market size

Okay$257K

$257K/yr · 165K searches

Avg price

Okay$207.64

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Quality gap

Okay4.5★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Conversion

Bad0.8%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Price range

Bad$84.22–$567.02

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Competition

The top 5 products take 44% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

22 falling

Sellers

32

Top-5 brand share

59%

Open market

35%

  • Fullway28%
  • Mastertrack8%
  • Evoluxx8%
  • Achilles8%
  • TRAVELSTAR7%
  • Continental5%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%4%$10K8%$21K12%$31K16%$41K1101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 28 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 102 weeks — +21.3% search growth over the last 90 days.
4K3KSpike '25Prime Day '25Spike '26DecMarJunAugNovMarMay

No pronounced peak months · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.5×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Wheel Quality44%

“Good tires for the Price”

Quality-Overall21%

“Good affordable brand”

Value For Money19%

“Great tires for the money”

Assembly/Installation4%

“To say the least - I am very happy with my purchase and the installation”

Friction4%

“have good traction”

Advertised Vs Actual Product4%

“As advertised”

Functionality-Overall2%

“Ride smooth”

Size-Overall1%

“Fit our '24 Toyota Highlander XLE”

What buyers complain about

Durability44%

“and they are coming apart on the sides”

Quality-Overall13%

“Garbage”

Thickness13%

“Tread not thick enough”

Value For Money13%

“It could have cost me my life”

Size-Overall13%

“Good looking tire only thing not my size”

Top return reasons

Size-Overall76%
Advertised Vs Actual Product10%
Compatibility-Overall7%
Value For Money3%
Adhesion/Stickiness2%
Functionality-Overall2%
Tread Pattern Pitch1%
Product Condition1%